[Robert_Paulson2]

did reagan sign it?

or did bush?
it is then BUSH'S bill...
if he would have vetoed it, it would have been called BUSH'S veto...

he didn't.
he should have.
we have a problem.

[Luis Gonzalez]

Reagan signed it. It's funded through 2006.

I know how badly you all want to shake up Bush's support, but I suggest that your time would be better spent over at Democratic Underground trying to regroup.

[Luis Gonzalez]

But I guess I can take heart in the fact that at least we are agreeing that Uncle Bill lied (again), since you're not making the argument that the bill is Clinton's Bill.