To: Luis Gonzalez
Seeing as to how this Act has been in effect since the Reagan administration, why hasn't it had those terrible consequences yet? Oh, it has. I can think of about 5 clients of mine that wanted to shoot me because I told them we couldn't put a building, road or other piece of infrastructure in a certain spot due to a puddle of water (not kidding....a f***ing puddle of water). Ultimately they spent MANY thousands of extra dollars on re-design all because some nitpickers at the state capital chose to interpret a set of regulations in a screwy manner. However, now that the issue is back on the front pages, many states that currently do not have similar regulations will feel pressured to adopt them, thus screwing the private property owners and businessmen even more.
141 posted on
01/09/2003 9:06:58 PM PST by
oldvike
To: oldvike
thus screwing the private property owners and businessmen even more.
thanks to bush/clinton
143 posted on
01/09/2003 9:08:26 PM PST by
TLBSHOW
(Keeping the Republicans Feet to the fire is a 24/7 job for conservatives)
To: oldvike
Yes, and by the same token, prior to the Act, reidential developments where built on Everglades swamp land. They are sinking.
145 posted on
01/09/2003 9:09:45 PM PST by
Luis Gonzalez
(The Ever So Humble Banana Republican)
To: oldvike
So, the terrible consequences you have experienced since Reagan began this policy boils down to 5 people not being able to get permits to build something?
149 posted on
01/09/2003 9:12:31 PM PST by
Luis Gonzalez
(The Ever So Humble Banana Republican)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson