He never said otherwise. No one here has said that it should be legal to drive under the influence of pot, just as it is not legal to drive under the influence of alcohol. And, as I already pointed out, there are hundreds of thousands of people pulled over every year who have a couple of six packs or a bottle of wine in the back that they are taking home. That's legal, and does not count as public intoxication. But if you are driving home with a bag of pot, that's illegal. So equating possession of pot with use outside the home is a logical fallacy, but you've shown quite a propensity for that, so we're hardly surprised, except for the fact that you are so impressed with yourself for engaging in such.