No, that isn't my evidence that Hall was going after the dog. Is Hall's "backing up when he shot the dog" your only evidence that he wasn't going after the dog?
No wonder you refuse to admit he was backing up when he shot the dog. That would ruin your case.
Would it? You mean, of course, my saying that Hall moved forward from his covering position to shoot the dog intentionally?
Tell ya' what. You tell me where Hall was at 17:20:38. Find him. Where was he at that time?
Hall's a liar, but it isn't my job to prove it. Tell ya' something else. That lying lunatic almost blew Smoak's head off too after he'd finished with the dog's.
It's clear on the tape that he turns to cover the Smoaks again but doesn't advance (like you claim he did with the dog). In fact he stands perfectly still, and doesn't move an inch for the rest of the tape. Had he shot at Mr. Smoak from his position he would have also hit both the of the cops holding Smoak. So, no, he didn't "almost blow Smoak's head off too".