To: patriciaruth
He shot the dog in the head and reacted wrongly. He could hvae shot the dog in a spot that would not have resulted in certain death. He deliberately killed the dog and should be held accountable in a court of law for the crime of murder.
268 posted on
01/09/2003 1:58:00 PM PST by
rwfromkansas
(www.fairtax.org: It is time for a FAIRTAX!)
To: rwfromkansas
He deliberately killed the dog and should be held accountable in a court of law for the crime of murder.I'm a dog-lover and a (small-l) libertarian, but don't you think you're the one overreacting a bit here? Last time I checked, the crime of murder required a human victim.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson