[Red Jones]

my recollection is that the Duke is correct; Somehow the FBI mis-lead everyone into thinking that Clinton DNA was submitted for comparison to the Danny WIlliams DNA. It was a big fraud that everyone went along with. Then afterwards a smart journalist asked questions and they wouldn't answer. I don't remember the details, but that was fraudulent about them testing Clinton's DNA to see if it matched Williams.

Of course this kid was fathered by Bill Clinton. But you know Clinton had so much scandalous behavior kept out of the media. Only a fool believes this is a free country IMHO. Look at all the clinton scandal info that was repressed. That doesn't happen in a free country.

Problem is that in another generation or two they will maybe succeed at outlawing the 'wrong' information and then even those who look outside the mainstream media will not be able to find out information.

We have to fight the corruption and the lies and the with-holding of important information by the media. We're not doing it.

[Lurking Libertarian]

my recollection is that the Duke is correct; Somehow the FBI mis-lead everyone into thinking that Clinton DNA was submitted for comparison to the Danny WIlliams DNA. It was a big fraud that everyone went along with. Then afterwards a smart journalist asked questions and they wouldn't answer. I don't remember the details, but that was fraudulent about them testing Clinton's DNA to see if it matched Williams.

Do you have a source for that?

The FBI never tested Clinton's DNA vs. Danny Williams'. It tested Clinton's DNA vs. the stain on Monica's dress and found a 100% match. Starr printed a portion of Clinton's DNA analysis in his report. A newspaper then got a sample of Willimas' DNA to compare to the published analysis of Clinton's DNA and found that they couldn't be a match.