Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dead
Lomborg convincingly demolishes the Scientific American article on his website. I'm not sure of the URL.

This is really scary. A board of scientific bureaucrats condemns science because it wasn't presented in the "proper format".

I thought scientist meant you understood what science is.
2 posted on 01/08/2003 9:15:03 AM PST by JmyBryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JmyBryan
Here is the URL: http://www.lomborg.com
3 posted on 01/08/2003 9:30:28 AM PST by fortress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: JmyBryan
I thought scientist meant you understood what science is.

It used to. Now that scientists are celebrities, it is incumbent upon them to be "scientifically correct", which is a version of "politically correct", with the same unproven assumptions.

4 posted on 01/08/2003 9:31:45 AM PST by elbucko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: JmyBryan
This is really scary. A board of scientific bureaucrats condemns science because it wasn't presented in the "proper format".

It’s only a little scary, since it’s just a little brainfart from the (never-before-heard-of, never-to-be-heard-of again) Danish Committees on Scientific Dishonesty.

Normally, such an undocumented, unsubstantiated, lightweight and completely worthless “report” wouldn’t even be considered newsworthy, but this one met the NY Time “All The News That Fits The Agenda” criteria.

7 posted on 01/08/2003 11:16:15 AM PST by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson