Posted on 01/07/2003 3:28:53 PM PST by Dog
Let me guess...like me, you are one of those "regular guys" that doesn't want Edwards as a "champion." I just love being part of a focus-group term the Dimswits are exploiting in soundbites. Wish I had been part of Edwards' focus group. I'd have given a few choice words he could use. Replace "champion" with "vacuous malodorous pervert" for example, compliments of Monty Python.
The President does his rendition of AC/DCs Big Balls.
Oh I've got Big Balls, I've got big Balls...lol
Take that Leaky.
Time will tell...It always does.
Now we can start bringing up Edwards' dispicable, trial-lawyer-style cross examination of Pickering during his FIRST confirmation hearings, RIGHT BESIDE THE EDWARDS/BYRD THING!!
Secret Holds have ended according to the following article but a hold can still be placed by a Senator but not in secret or that is what I read into the situation.
Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott, R-Miss., and Minority Leader Tom Daschle, D-S.D., have agreed to require senators who unilaterally delay Senate action to identify themselves. Individual senators will still be able to stop any bill or nomination in its tracks, but not to dodge accountability by remaining anonymous.
Charles Pickering
WASHINGTON (CNN) --Senate Democrats vowed Wednesday to block the elevation of Charles Pickering to a federal appeals court, one day after President Bush renominated the Mississippi judge and 30 others who had failed to win confirmation under the previous Democratic-controlled Senate.
"I'm prepared to do everything I can to stop the nomination of Justice Pickering," said Sen. Charles Schumer, D-New York, who sits on the Senate Judiciary Committee. "We can do a lot better."
Bush renominated Pickering, Priscilla Owen of Texas and the others late Tuesday, only hours after the new Senate convened -- with Republicans in control. With the GOP in the majority, Bush has a better chance of moving his judicial nominations through, but Democrats can filibuster and block nominations that way.
The renomination of Pickering came as a surprise to many Washington insiders after speculation that Pickering's name would not turn up again following the recent Trent Lott firestorm.
Lott was forced to resign as Senate majority leader last month after making comments that many people saw as expressing support for segregation.
Pickering -- a Mississippi native and friend of Lott's -- was rejected by the Senate Judiciary Committee last March on a 10-9 party line vote.
Civil rights advocates and many Democrats criticized him as racially insensitive and questioned whether he would uphold civil rights.
Democrats returned to those themes Wednesday and pointedly raised references to the Lott controversy.
Sen. Richard Durbin, D-Illinois, cited the "painful reflection" brought on by Lott's comments.
"With the renomination of Charles Pickering to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, the White House called into question all of its promises to demonstrate that the party of Abraham Lincoln was truly committed to civil rights," said Durbin, who also sits on the Senate Judiciary Committee.
But Republicans have strongly defended Pickering, saying the charges are unfair and that he is more than qualified to sit on a federal appeals court.
"He has quite an admirable record of race relations in Mississippi and got the unanimous support of the African-American community in Mississippi, including the NAACP," said Sen. Rick Santorum, R-Pennsylvania, on January 1.
Pickering is a U.S. District judge in Mississippi; former chairman of the Mississippi Republican Party; former state senator and former president of the Mississippi Baptist Convention. He has been nominated for a seat on the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, based in New Orleans.
Critics of Pickering had contended he would not uphold abortion rights and they questioned whether he would uphold civil rights. They noted that he has been critical of the Voting Rights Act. They also pointed to a law review article he wrote more than 40 years ago, suggesting ways to amend the state's law banning interracial marriages so that it would pass constitutional muster.
Tuesday, Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Massachusetts, promised that the Democrats would "use every tool in our arsenal to ensure that his nomination is rejected again this year."
Bush did not issue a statement on the nominations, but sent the names to the new Senate Judiciary Committee, which has a Republican majority.
Republicans had sharply criticized the last Congress, saying it rejected Bush's judicial nominations due to partisan politics. With the GOP now in control of the chamber, they are hoping for a much easier confirmation process this time around.
The nominations include 17 for the Circuit Court of Appeals, including Pickering, and 14 for U.S. District Court.
Pickering's son, Rep. Charles "Chip" Pickering Jr., R-Mississippi, was formerly Lott's legislative aide.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.