Personal attacks do not win the debate. In fact, they disqualify you. You alleged that Glenn was, and I quote, "a poser pretending to understand computers." Glenn then provided proof that he is quite deeply involved in the IT industry. You responded by waving your hand and insulting him. Glenn thus wins under the rules of any legitimate debate organization.
Personal attacks do not win the debate.
Please tell that to Glenn (he started it)
In fact, they disqualify you. You alleged that Glenn was, and I quote, "a poser pretending to understand computers." Glenn then provided proof that he is quite deeply involved in the IT industry. You responded by waving your hand and insulting him. Glenn thus wins under the rules of any legitimate debate organization.
Nice try.
Glenn opened up by attacking me personally. I repeatedly asked him to support his bold unsupported claim and he refused and continued to hurl insults. Glenn provided no evidence that he is even involved in the IT industry and he still refuses to answer simple questions (to back up his BS). I guess you are practicing the "anything to defend my Mac" debate philosophy but if anybody reads the thread they will find your statements a wee bit lacking in the reality department. I only presented my comments about Glenn after enduring a long string of insults and repeatedly asking him to backup his bold unsupported claims.
Do you have anything to add to the debate other than "The Mac guys kicks your ass". Comments like yours are completely useless.
Here are some simple questions:
What makes a computer system superior?
What are the characteristics of a successful or superior operating system or computer platform?
How important is market share to the success of a computer platform?
What are the major factors you use to decide what computer system to buy?