Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Unveils $674 Billion Economic Plan
Reuters via Yahoo ^ | 1/7/03

Posted on 01/07/2003 11:04:15 AM PST by B-bone

Bush Unveils $674 Billion Economic Plan

CHICAGO (Reuters) - President Bush (news - web sites) on Tuesday proposed a $674 billion boost for a struggling U.S. economy with measures including an end to taxes that shareholders pay on dividends -- a move denounced by Democrats as a politically motivated windfall for the rich.

"I will ask members of both parties to work with me to secure our economic future. We cannot be satisfied until every part of our economy is healthy and vigorous," Bush said in a speech to the Economic Club of Chicago.

The "growth and jobs" package aims to kick-start the U.S. economy by encouraging consumer spending, promoting investment that will create jobs and helping the unemployed.

It will include the acceleration of across-the-board rate cuts, immediate tax relief for married couples and families with children, and bigger incentives for small businesses to invest in new equipment.

In all the White House says it will give 92 million taxpayers an average tax cut of $1,083 this year. Up to 35 million people who get income from dividends could benefit.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush; economicplan; taxes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 221-225 next last
To: muawiyah
Technically speaking, within the current tax year Pelosi is correct.

It depends on the meaning of the word "is."

101 posted on 01/07/2003 12:05:59 PM PST by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender
RE: "pretty incredible. It's nice having a president with brass pelotas."

Yeah; do you suppose he got them in his stocking this Christmas?

I wish he'd had them back when he folded to the 'Rats and NEA and left Vouchers conspicuously out of the "No Child Left Behind" so-called educational reform, or when he went belly-up and signed off on McCain's pet "abolish the 1st Amemdment/ Liberal Incumbent Protection" CFR Bill.

Did you hear the RATS come squealing out from under their rocks with fang and claws bared immediately attacking his proposals? They sounded pretty pathetic to me.

I hope "W" has his new Christmas gifts tied on real tight; I reckon he's gonna need 'em soon.
102 posted on 01/07/2003 12:06:33 PM PST by Uncle Jaque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
...that income has been deferred and any earnings on it accrue tax free until withdrawn...

Well, that's true but since the tax is paid when it is withdrawn one's rate of return is considerably less. Having those dividends be tax free when they are withdrawn increases the attractiveness of 401(k)s and IRAs. That means people will be better able to provide for their retirement, which was one of the objectives stated in W's speech.

Also, if anyone has to withdraw early, the earnings are taxed and there is a heafty penalty to boot!

103 posted on 01/07/2003 12:06:46 PM PST by Wphile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
It won't happen if we don't demand it happen....it is such a radical thing he needs our support so when the attacks come, he can stand tall and say "I have the support and it is time for a change."

I remember reading that it is something being considered for the 2004 election push, and it is not just the former Treasury Sec. that wants it. So, I have hope. But, we need to fight for it.....call the WH etc.
104 posted on 01/07/2003 12:08:21 PM PST by rwfromkansas (www.fairtax.org: It is time for a Fair Tax!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS
Does anybody know if there is a blood line between the Reagan's and the Bush's?

Don't know about Ronnie and W, but 43 is a distant relative of Winston Churchill (also of the late Princess Diana).

105 posted on 01/07/2003 12:08:30 PM PST by GretchenEE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
They'll see who's right here, and it sure ain't the RATS!

Yeh. NOW the democrats seem to think THEIR $300 muffler is a good thing. LOL

106 posted on 01/07/2003 12:09:38 PM PST by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: All
Of note from the article:

"Democrats want to give a $300 tax credit to all taxpayers,
even those who don't make enough to owe anything."

What a joke. No wonder they call it a tax "credit" rather than a tax break!

107 posted on 01/07/2003 12:09:42 PM PST by .30Carbine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Wphile; rwfromkansas
Ah yes......all that being agreeable in the last two years has paid dividends.......pun intended.

He now has the trust of the American people and a Republican Congress, and can afford to go for the jugular on some things, while being patient and incremental on others.

Does anyone still think this man is stupid??

108 posted on 01/07/2003 12:10:51 PM PST by ohioWfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
What is that one?
109 posted on 01/07/2003 12:11:53 PM PST by rwfromkansas (www.fairtax.org: It is time for a Fair Tax!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: .30Carbine
"Democrats want to give a $300 tax credit to all taxpayers,

ROTF. Dasholes "muffler!" LOL.

110 posted on 01/07/2003 12:12:10 PM PST by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: PatrioticAmerican
Congress should be embarrassed by his use of common sense to demand enactment of their tax bills.

When something as plain and simple as Common Sense can righteously slap Congress upside the head, it certainly points out in stark relief how far we have fallen from what our forefathers struggled so valiantly to obtain for us!

111 posted on 01/07/2003 12:12:10 PM PST by GretchenEE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
I didn't see anywhere in the President's plan that he intends for withdrawals from 401(k) plans to be allowed tax free. Such an action would be comparable to allowing all other dividend payments to be made tax free.

Remember, with a 401(k) plan, you put in money, not stock, and you withdraw money, not stock.

With 60% of stock being held by institutions (mostly for 401(k) and other retirement plans, or for Liberal nonprofit foundations), we have to assume for the sake of argument that we have 60% of stock dividends already subject to no taxation anyway.

What is happening is the 40% of dividends not already taxed will no longer be subject to taxes.

It seems to me that the value of a 401(k) as an investment opportunity has just been substantially depreciated unless you are also getting a substantial sum in employer matching contributions.

Equity would demand that we be able to withdraw our 401(k) funds tax free to the extent such funds derive from our own direct investments and not from employer matching contributions.

112 posted on 01/07/2003 12:13:26 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Jaque
Part of the reason he has the leverage to get what he wants NOW, is because he compromised BEFORE.

Wait and see what happens with those things he gave up to get the BIG fish, now that he has a Congress that will support him.

113 posted on 01/07/2003 12:13:29 PM PST by ohioWfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
Say what? The $400 tax break is a FEDERAL tax not a state tax. The states get very little money from the Federal government - about 9% of a school's budget comes from the Feds.

It wouldn't matter to me if the Feds only paid .5%....the underline concept is still valid:  families with children use far more public resources than single, childless people.  Why then, do the families get the tax break? 

I should get the tax break: I don't have a kid in school.

114 posted on 01/07/2003 12:14:00 PM PST by Psycho_Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Technically speaking, within the current tax year Pelosi is correct

Only if you're willing to change the definition of words.

Besides, her lie is more sinister than that. The implication is that making dividends tax-free won't have any impact on people with those retirement accounts.

It sure the heck will. There are taxable and non-taxable withdrawals from those accounts, and this would shift dividend payments into the non-taxable category. The impact of that for many retirees will be huge.

115 posted on 01/07/2003 12:14:02 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
What is that one?

What?

116 posted on 01/07/2003 12:14:55 PM PST by Wphile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics; .30Carbine
I think that cute little 'muffler' thing may have been the beginning of the end for our little friend, tommy! :o)
117 posted on 01/07/2003 12:15:42 PM PST by ohioWfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: xrp
I could really make do with an extra $1100 or so. $600 to invest and $500 to spend!

I doubt that couples who make $39,000/yr are into investing...

actually $20/week extra equals an extra pizza/week.

118 posted on 01/07/2003 12:15:53 PM PST by krodriguesdc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Psycho_Bunny
Okay, I see your beef but your beef should be where your education tax dollars go to and where they come from. That's probably your property taxes and your state income tax, if you state has an income tax. That's where you should direct your rage. And, I agree with you as well. The real stinker is those of us who pay private school tuition and have to belly up the taxes for the public school which we choose not to use because it is incompetent! Aaaargghh!
119 posted on 01/07/2003 12:17:40 PM PST by Wphile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: All
Immediately after President Bush's economical proposal speech, an ad site on Yahoo was swamped by the Rats in Congress. Go to this link to see what all the Rats need after President Bush's speech: (Yahoo Ad Link for Rats in Congress)
120 posted on 01/07/2003 12:17:43 PM PST by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 221-225 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson