A woman who is physically capable of making non-consent clear has a responsibility to do so in any case where she has previously given consent. The original article suggested that the girl had failed to make her non-consent unmistakably clear. Post #129 rebutted that, and suggested circumstances which should reasonably be defined as rape [among other things, she used the "N" word which--for whatever reason--the minority judge ignored].
If your overall point is that women share responsibility for their actions, then I agree.
Its my opinion that in the case at hand, the female didn't really say no and resist. Her story is "made up after the fact" and events and her claims dont add up to a rape.