From these facts it is a clear case of rape and the news story has absolutely nothing to do with the facts. Thank you for finding these facts as they make the decision clear. What was presented in the news story was completely different than what was presented by these facts.
Stay well - Stay safe - stay armed - Yorktown
harpseal says: "
What was presented in the news story was completely different than what was presented by these facts"
It sure was different, but, as they say, bad cases make for bad case law. And this case sets the standard that, even where consent was freely given, that a retraction of that consent during intercourse is controlling as to whether the crime of rape occurred. Any man that wouldn't stop when asked to do so (during intercourse) may be a jerk, but he is not a rapist, imo.
Regards,
Boot Hill