Replies

As a matter of fact, there have been some historians who have concluded there is more evidence for the existence of Jesus Christ than there is for Julius Caesar, particularly in regard to the impact of that life on individuals and upon civilization. Other historians have said that there is compelling evidence for the resurrection. Some have tried to disprove the resurrection looking sole at evidence, only to become convinced of its reality. Don't be to hasty with your conclusions if you're ignorant of these works.

I don't have to be a mind reader to know your heart. The stridency of your contrary attitude toward the most important Christian teaching reveals your heart perfectly well.

At what point did I ever cast doubt that Christ existed? Never. Not once. As for the Resurrection, the only thing I said was that there was no scientific proof. If there are historians who believed it happened, well, good then. Though personally I haven't seen any. But at no point, AT NO POINT, did I say it DIDN'T happen. I was just making the case that it's a bit anal to get upset when Historians don't talk about Christ being resurrected or that he died for our sins.

But hey, if you're one of those Christians who likes to attack people for not seeming to be "Christian Enough", then hey, feel free to cast all the stones you like. I can take it.