Another perfect example of media bias

MSNBC/WP ^ | January 6, 2003 | MSNBC/WP

[ejdrapes]

MSNBC Front Page:

[Timesink]

Oh come on, can't you see that Pelosi is FIGHTING for the little guy in that picture?!

I think she looks like she just ATE the little guy!

[Teacher317]

Southack's thread, that I'm having a lot of fun with:
Things The Media Doesn't Want You To Know

[PaulJ]

Do you think Dem's would've found it biased if a few years ago it had read:

Focus on Jobs.
Republicans to unveil alternative stimulus plan.
Clinton Proposal Faulted.

[San Jacinto]

The headlines are very biased, but having Pelosi's face on there kind of even things out.

[perfect stranger]

I would vote for Gorak before any Democrat.

[vannrox]

.


About the Bias...


How can the Bush proposal be Found to be Faulted?
It hasen't even been released for public review yet.
The reporting of this article Leads the reader to the untrue conclusion that the Democrats have reviewed and seen the proposal.
That is what bias is all about.
Distorting and skiewing the news.


Any person whom looks at this article will believe that this report has been released and that there are faults with it.
Which is what the Bias Newsmedia wants the reader to think.


.

[StarfireIV]

LOL "Separated at birth"

[ejdrapes]

Notice that the other day on PMSNBC's website the main headline was NOT 'Bush to unveil economic package'...it was 'Democrats attack Bush proposals' or something like that. Nearly every headline the past few days from APReutersCNNABCCBSMSNBCNYTIMESLATIMESWASHINGTONPOST, ect. mentioned the RATS and their reaction to the Bush plan - even though the details haven't been released! Pelosi even admitted that what she knew of Bush's proposals was from what the media RATS published. That's bias right there - the media RATS think the bigger story is the Dems reaction to Bush's plan, rather than the substance of his plan. It will be interesting to see the headlines once the details come out.