Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RightWhale
That is, 99% of the sky is washed out and permanently invisible. Is this a good thing?

Let's see... I love to gaze into a clear sky on a dark night out in the country as much as the next guy -- really, I do! -- but, if the choice is between light pollution and living in 1948, I'll take the light pollution, thank you very much. ;-)

"99%"? Two-thirds of the planet is covered with water. Of the remaining one third, maybe 15% (at worst?) is "polluted" with light.

You could always go out to sea, move out to the country, or settle in N. Korea, China, Greenland, ... if that's your idea of living.

15 posted on 01/06/2003 11:22:24 AM PST by newgeezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: newgeezer
I'll take the light pollution

It isn't necessary to choose lights or darkness. We can have both. In fact, this is the law in several communities, in a couple of states, and in a few countries already. Simply control the lighting so it doesn't glare into your neighbor's yard, and stop letting all those light rays escape into the sky; shield those fixtures so the light goes where it is needed.

18 posted on 01/06/2003 11:31:44 AM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson