An intellectually honest answer would say just what this article says: Evidence to this point shows no warming of the troposphere.
Anything more than that is not justified at this point.
I find it fascinating that true believers of the global-warming religion go to such lengths to ignore real evidence in favor of computer projections and other estimates that have no basis in reality and are changed every few years when the data disprove them.
The abstracts for these papers are already available online; I can provide URLs to the papers if you want them. These papers include figures of data that has already been acquired and analyzed. Such is the pace of scientific advance these days. If people cling to outdated arguments, then they will be left behind.
An intellectually honest answer would say just what this article says: Evidence to this point shows no warming of the troposphere.
An accurate answer would say: previous analyses of the data show no warming of the troposphere; current analyses of the data now show warming of the troposphere.
I find it fascinating that true believers of the global-warming religion go to such lengths to ignore real evidence in favor of computer projections and other estimates that have no basis in reality and are changed every few years when the data disprove them.
The real evidence is the observed increase in the height of the tropopause. There are only a few explanations for that observation that make sense.