Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 4ConservativeJustices
That is an interesting quote. My only contention is that however the legislatures decide (lottery, fistfight, duel would all be constitutional as far as I understand) to appoint the Electors those Electors must hold an Election to decide who to vote for. Even a three person Election. That is why the Electors are called Electors.
81 posted on 01/08/2003 6:39:00 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]


To: justshutupandtakeit
... to appoint the Electors those Electors must hold an Election to decide who to vote for.

Sorry for the delay. I do agree that according to the Constitution Presidential electors must be chosen, and that they must meet on a given day to cast their ballots for the new chief executive. But nowhere is there a constutitional requirement that the electors "choose" from a collective pool of candidates. Some might consider this to be some deep, dark conspiracy with some sinister purpose, but it is what the founders gave us - the electors are free to choose whomever they so desire - as directed by their respective state constitutions and laws.

83 posted on 01/09/2003 7:44:21 PM PST by 4CJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson