Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne
The disruptor is in violation of federal law and should remind us what democrats are all about. He? (she?..it?) undoubtedly votes democrat and may very well be a planned disruptor. The Clintons and the DNC have a formal campaign afoot to attack, reduce, or destroy alternative media.

FreeRepublic can certainly expect many more of these attacks between now and the elections of 2004.

I would love to see the DNC sued for the substantial financial liability in its attacks on free speech, if it could ever be documented that the DNC ordered disruptors to destroy the private property of others (i.e. FreeRepublic.com). I would point out this also involves violations of the RICO act, producing triple punitive damages.

62 posted on 01/06/2003 5:20:38 AM PST by friendly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: friendly
Amen to that!!!
235 posted on 01/06/2003 9:00:59 AM PST by FreepLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson