Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: seenenuf
I cannot believe that the last 'caller' was not set up in advance to embarrass Phyllis about her tax exampt foundation.
Connie held the call until the last minute and then allowed the caller to go on and on.....
What'd you think?
35 posted on 01/05/2003 12:01:32 PM PST by mickie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: mickie
I'm inclined to agree. However, we don't know who was
producing the show, and if that was an inside deal. I have got through for one call, years ago, and they only confirmed my location, not POV.
I would like to know if that has changed.
In the past 2 or 3 years, I have become very bored with
Washington Journal, when they have a dumb generic question, i.e., "Do you agree with...etc". It's about as boring as reading 'bump' on FR.
36 posted on 01/05/2003 12:08:31 PM PST by seenenuf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: mickie
Schalfly hit her out of the ball park when she said she had not hired the caller to dictate the agenda of the Eagle Forum. In any case, the caller made an astonishingly weak case against the tax exempt status, like not having a list of women ready. What a laugh. Atleast that stupid woman who called should know it will take something bigger than that to even raise an issue with the tax exempt status.
37 posted on 01/05/2003 12:09:13 PM PST by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson