Skip to comments.
Just how Pro-Life is Rhode Island?
Posted on 01/04/2003 7:28:58 AM PST by No Dems 2004
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Would love to hear everyone's comments on the above.
To: No Dems 2004
2
posted on
01/04/2003 7:41:20 AM PST
by
dighton
To: No Dems 2004
Abortion is legal and available in Rhode Island, as in every other state. The governor can't shut them down, no matter how pro-life he is. It's an issue of federal law.
Now, get these people to vote Bush in '04 and maybe we can get him a mandate to appoint pro-life judges and reverse Roe V. Wade, then supposedly pro-life states like RI can outlaw abortion.
To: Batrachian
"Abortion is legal and available in Rhode Island, as in every other state. The governor can't shut them down, no matter how pro-life he is. It's an issue of federal law."
Believe me, I know that no pro-life governor anywhere can overturn Roe vs Wade. I do hope you didn't count me for being that ignorant.
But the point I'm making is that it seems quite remarkable Rhode Island would elect a pro-life governor (he can have an influence on various bits of legislation). The Northeast doesn't have a big reputation for electing pro-life governors, and that's my point. What I'm trying to ascertain is just how deep this pro-life movement is in Rhode Island.
To: No Dems 2004; Batrachian
"Abortion is legal and available in Rhode Island, as in every other state. The governor can't shut them down, no matter how pro-life he is. It's an issue of federal law." Believe me, I know that no pro-life governor anywhere can overturn Roe vs Wade. I do hope you didn't count me for being that ignorant.
Actually, this is untrue. All Supreme Court decisions purporting to make abortion "legal" are null, because it is impossible to make murder legal anywhere, anytime. What a governor cannot do is stop abortion in his state without precipitating a crisis. That's entirely different from being unable to stop abortion.
To: No Dems 2004
RI may be the most catholic but it also has the highest percentage of households where the total IQ of the occupants doesn't add up to the thermostat setting.
Nothing positive will ever happen in RI.
It is a place that started out poorly and has managed to sink lower every year.
Such a shame. It would be a nice place if you got everyone who lives there to move.
To: No Dems 2004
Spent a year in Rogue Island. Very Catholic...very blue-collar. Heavy-duty union presence.
Interesting, though: VJ Day* is still a state holiday!
*Victory over Japan for those of you in Rio Linda.
7
posted on
01/04/2003 11:19:12 AM PST
by
paddles
To: No Dems 2004
I've often said it, and I'll say it again: the only hope for pro-lifers in much of New England is the Democratic party. This is true in Maine, Massachusetts and Rhode Island, at least. Republicans there are totally worthless RINOs on not only social conservative issues, but other issues as well. Conservatives should think twice and examine the candidates' records in those states before reflexively voting Republican.
To: The Old Hoosier
"Republicans there are totally worthless RINOs on not only social conservative issues, but other issues as well. Conservatives should think twice and examine the candidates' records in those states before reflexively voting Republican."
Except Don Carcieri, I guess.
To: No Dems 2004
We need Catholic Conservatives in the GOP in these states to win these elections ... RINOs and the rich wimp republicans are the leftovers of the WASP culture, and their pathetic vote totals reflect how small a minority WASPs have become in New England.
Note the name of the Republican who won in Rhode Island, a nice ethnic name. :-)
10
posted on
01/04/2003 1:33:46 PM PST
by
WOSG
Comment #11 Removed by Moderator
To: Arthur McGowan
Don't quibble. We both know what the realities of the situation are.
To: No Dems 2004
"
But the point I'm making is that it seems quite remarkable Rhode Island would elect a pro-life governor"
How much of an issue did he make of abortion in his election? I suspect he never even mentioned it, certainly did not make a major issue of it. If it was a referendum on abortion he would have lost. This is still the Northeast, after all.
Of course, I'm just guessing. The only thing I know about Rhode Island is that it is small and has that big blue bug in Providence.
To: No Dems 2004
Good post, the election of pro-life governors in Rhode Island and Vermont were big victories in 2002. It should be noted that Carcieri is also fiscally conservative and pro-business.
Regarding Weygard, the Chafee opponent, in their debates he wasn't entirely pro-life, I don't think, but did support some limits, and highlighted his opposition to partial birth abortion, which Chafee defended!
Conservatives should stick to their guns and run folks who are real, blue-collar people and small businessmen, for office, instead of elitist twits like that pro-abortion Snowe aide who lost to blue collar pro-life Mike Michaud in ME-2.
14
posted on
01/04/2003 2:12:32 PM PST
by
JohnnyZ
To: No Dems 2004
Good post, the election of pro-life governors in Rhode Island and Vermont were big victories in 2002. It should be noted that Carcieri is also fiscally conservative and pro-business.
Regarding Weygard, the Chafee opponent, in their debates he wasn't entirely pro-life, I don't think, but did support some limits, and highlighted his opposition to partial birth abortion, which Chafee defended!
Conservatives should stick to their guns and run folks who are real, blue-collar people and small businessmen, for office, instead of elitist twits like that pro-abortion Snowe aide who lost to blue collar pro-life Mike Michaud in ME-2.
15
posted on
01/04/2003 2:12:33 PM PST
by
JohnnyZ
To: No Dems 2004
Interesting article. However, I would always question if a Dem was pro-life. The national party is so overwhelmingly pro-abortion (Ann Coulter has even "suggested" renaming the party the Abortion party since they are so steadfast in their support of abortion). It is always an interesting race if a Rep is for abortion and the Dem is for life.
16
posted on
01/04/2003 3:39:09 PM PST
by
votelife
To: dighton; No Dems 2004
17
posted on
01/04/2003 4:45:11 PM PST
by
Coleus
To: Coleus
One other thing in evaluating the life issue is that some politicians will claim to be pro-life, but aren't...Mary Landrieu, anyone? The tough choice is sometimes, but rarely, btw a pro-choice Rep who will confirm judges and a pro-life Dem, who might not...or a pro life Dem, but who will vote for leadership which won't allow a vote on a pro-life judge.
18
posted on
01/04/2003 5:27:39 PM PST
by
votelife
To: votelife
19
posted on
01/04/2003 5:52:10 PM PST
by
Coleus
To: No Dems 2004
>>
Don Carcieri, a strongly pro-life Republican (endorsed by pro-life groups) was elected in Rhode Island's open gubernatorial race by a margin of 55%-45% in 2002. Carcieri also vowed to veto any attempt to legalize homosexual marriage <<
You mean a social CONSERVATIVE actually WON statewide in Rhode Island?!
This is news! I wonder how the heck that happened in socialist New England (note the that "Republican" Senator from RI only won by running to the LEFT of his 'RAT opponent). One wonders if an awakening is occuring in New England and they are reverting back to the Coolidge Conservativism that they abandoned decades ago.
If we can rebuild the New-England/Mid-west Republican co-alition of the early 20th century, we can thwart the efforts of the 'RATs to win future Presidential elections by running folksy southern governors in the Carter/Clinton mold...
20
posted on
01/04/2003 8:21:24 PM PST
by
BillyBoy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson