Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pro-Marijuana Group Mounts New Offensive Against US Drug Policy
CNSNews | 1/03/02 | Jim Burns

Posted on 01/03/2003 4:09:03 PM PST by Sparta

(CNSNews.com) - A group supporting the legalization of marijuana is planning a new Internet offensive against the Bush administration after an administration official alleged that marijuana-related hospital emergency room visits are way up.

Scott Burns, deputy director for state and local affairs for the White House Office of National Drug Control, said in a letter to the National District Attorneys' Association that "marijuana is not harmless but has risen as a factor in emergency room visits 176 percent since 1964, surpassing heroin."

He said district attorneys, county prosecutors and other law enforcement officials must better educate the public about the drug's danger.

"Smoking marijuana," Burns wrote, "leads to changes in the brain similar to those caused by the use of cocaine and heroin, and affects alertness, concentration, perception, coordination and reaction time."

He cited an unidentified study of a roadside check of reckless drivers not impaired by alcohol that he said found "45 percent tested positive for marijuana."

Burns also said marijuana is addictive and leads to the use of harder drugs.

Burns was unavailable for further comment on the story Thursday, according to a spokesman for his office.

Keith Stroup, executive director of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML), called the administration's stand an "incredibly disgusting example of government propaganda" and announced that his group is initiating a new offensive next week against the administration's anti-drug policy.

"This war against marijuana smokers has become a jihad. It's a holy war for these [Bush administration] fools. Truth is a first victim of war," said Stroup in an interview with CNSNews.com .

"Every single point they make in this letter is either a flat-out lie or grossly misrepresents science. Our intent is by early next week to post both their letter [written by Scott Burns] and our refutation point by point on our website," Stroup said.

The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration said, in a study of 458 hospital emergency rooms nationwide, that drug-related emergency room visits rose six percent in 2001 over the previous year, to a new total of 638,484.

The number of times marijuana was mentioned as a drug used by patients rose 15 percent, greater than the increase in cocaine use, which rose 10 percent, according to the administration.

Dan Alsobrooks, in a letter on the National District Attorneys' Association website, called on prosecutors around the country to heed Burns' words and speak out more "forcefully" against legalizing marijuana and all drugs.

"Unless we speak out more forcefully," Alsobrooks wrote, "our communities continue to face an increasing onslaught of violence and death directly attributable to use of dangerous and poisonous drugs.

"Those who want to legalize drugs advance their position, issue by issue, winning by incremental victories. We can and have stopped their efforts at the national level but will lose all if the states yield individually," he said.

Stroup said the administration must move its drug policy into the 21st Century.

"These guys are simply resurrecting 'reefer madness' from the 1930s, and the cause of their approach is based on lies and misinformation," Stroup said. "They are bound to fail because they never seem to learn."

"Reefer Madness" was a 1930s cult movie about marijuana and its evil effect on people.

Stroup contends the administration's claims that hospital visits have risen because of marijuana use are based on what he called "hospital mentions."

He explained that a hospital "mention" is how hospitals report a patient's emergency room visit. At that time, patients are asked what drugs they have taken.

As an example, Stroup said, "Whenever someone comes in because they broke their wrist in a softball game, among the questions they [hospital officials] ask them is 'have they used any illicit drugs.'"

"So, naturally, when you have over 80 million Americans who have smoked marijuana at some time in their lives, and if people are willing to be honest, it's not infrequent that they mention they occasionally smoke marijuana," he said.

"That [marijuana use] doesn't have a G** D***** thing to do with their purpose for being in the emergency room, but those are still listed and counted as mentions," Stroup said.

The federal Drug Abuse Warning Network, according to its website, counts the mentions of illegal drugs and misused prescription drugs reported by patients and compiles them in semi-annual studies. Often, according to the network, patients have said they had taken more than one drug.

Alcohol, according to the network, in combination with other drugs was the most frequently mentioned nationwide, at 34 percent. Cocaine had 30 percent mentions, marijuana 17 percent and heroin 15 percent.

Burns contends that "nationwide, no drug matches the threat posed by marijuana. It is a much bigger problem than most people, including some in law enforcement, realize."

Stroup scoffed at that statement. "There were something like 450,000 deaths from tobacco smoking, and there were over 100,000 deaths from alcohol drinking, and there has never been a death caused by marijuana," he insisted.

The South Carolina Department of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Services agreed that, "no one has ever died from a marijuana overdose."

"However, when taken at very high doses, marijuana can produce severe psychotic symptoms that can require medical treatment," the department stated in a report on marijuana on its website.

States that allow marijuana to be used for medical purposes are: Arizona, California, Nevada, Oregon, Washington State, Alaska, Hawaii, Maine and the District of Columbia.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fedjobprotection; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: caisson71; thepitts
I hear Canada will start legalizing mj so maybe the pot heads can move north, way north.

The State in which I live decriminalized possession back in the 70's. Anything under a certain amount (more than 3 times what the Canadians are proposing for their decrim) results in a $100 citation. As long as I'm not stupid enough to grow it or sell it, its bascially a traffic ticket. To quote Walter Williams, "Smugglers are my heroes". I'll be staying put.

21 posted on 01/03/2003 4:45:06 PM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: caisson71
I'd rather live next to a pothead than a drunk any day. I'm amazed that so many so readily accept the use/abuse of alcohol and tobacco, but go ballistic when the subject turns to toking. The facts are there: of the three, cannabis is, by far, the least harmful.
22 posted on 01/03/2003 5:14:21 PM PST by be-baw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: be-baw
So you say. A drunk is just as bad as a pothead.
23 posted on 01/03/2003 5:32:21 PM PST by caisson71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
Good.
24 posted on 01/03/2003 5:33:12 PM PST by caisson71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: thepitts
Now, three grandchildren! Before that, four children.
25 posted on 01/03/2003 5:34:29 PM PST by caisson71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Sparta
I've got a solution for all parties.

States ought subject illicit drugs to retail sales taxes, while maintaining their illegality. That way purveyors can get permits and the DOJ can selectively bust them, as usual.

They might as well. The drugs won't go away, but neither will the budget deficits. Nor will the entrenched legal system that supposedly fights it. We can give I.D.'s and health benefits to runners. We'll deduct payroll taxes that if they collect they'll get busted. Everybody's happy.

Sure the income tax covers drug profits, but generally, not specifically. Since when did government not tax something just because it's illegal?
26 posted on 01/03/2003 5:49:44 PM PST by nicollo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caisson71
I hope the Feds make it emphatically clear that marijuana use will never be legalized in the US.

The Federal government has no authority to regulate drugs. This is due to the Tenth Amendment. You know, the one that conservatives point to when they want the government out of some economic issue. It applies to social issues as well. The entire Federal War on Drugs is criminal activity.

Since the Federal judges do not automatically throw out all drug charges as unconstitutional, it is up to juries to refuse to convict drug defendants. They are not doing their duty as jurors otherwise.

27 posted on 01/03/2003 6:35:08 PM PST by Mike4Freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: caisson71
So you say. A drunk is just as bad as a pothead.

Drunks are much worse that pot users and they are doing much more damage to their health. When Pot becomes fully legal, I suspect that doctors will advise their beer/liquor using patients to switch to Marijuana for health benefits. No calories, no liver effect, no possibility of overdose, just a pleasant high.

You can get a lethal dose of alcohol for about $20 and consume it in one sitting. There is no way to do that with MJ.

28 posted on 01/03/2003 9:13:56 PM PST by Mike4Freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Mike4Freedom
To all you say:

Hypocrisy is the mortar which fills in the chinks of the establishment's fortress of lies.

Hypocrisy is necessary as an emotional tool to bind folks to the established order. Once one invests in a lie sufficiently, one will cling to that lie against all evidence.

Look at any garden-variety leftist-- they are all self-blinded.

It's a shame that so many who claim to be loyal to America and its Constitution have been reduced to being mere parroters of the Gubmint's Party line. The techniques used by Governments to 'manage' the population work because we live in Socialist times, but this political delusion won't last forever.

The great thing about such hypocrisy is that it helps to alienate youth from the state's institutions. Most teenagers know that their parents, teachers, and other socially-approved authorities are full of self-satisfied smugness at having successfully maintained a public facade of decency despite grievous flaws of character.

You will find that arguing with those who merely want to be on the side of power is a fruitless task, but you may educate some lurkers and amuse the rest of us. ;^)

Cheers.

29 posted on 01/04/2003 8:04:57 AM PST by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Mike4Freedom
When Pot becomes fully legal, I suspect that doctors will advise their beer/liquor using patients to switch to Marijuana for health benefits.

Bump for archive

30 posted on 01/04/2003 8:12:58 AM PST by Hacksaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: caisson71
Now, three grandchildren! Before that, four children.

Ah yes, do it for the children. Classic liberal reasoning.

31 posted on 01/04/2003 5:35:16 PM PST by thepitts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Hacksaw
Dittoes
32 posted on 01/05/2003 8:27:04 PM PST by dcwusmc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Mike4Freedom; Hacksaw; *Wod_list
When Pot becomes fully legal, I suspect that doctors will advise their beer/liquor using patients to switch to Marijuana for health benefits.

Wouldn't surprise me; I'd expect many more to make the switch on their own, since nobody enjoys vomiting or hangovers.

33 posted on 01/06/2003 6:44:21 AM PST by MrLeRoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: jmc813; Sparta
My, a lot of that info sure sounds familiar.
I love Lurkers...
34 posted on 01/09/2003 11:06:00 AM PST by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: caisson71
The states cannot live without Federal money = it's also a Federal issue

Where does that money come from? While your argument is unique, it is probably so because it is indefensible(sp?). On the other hand, it does make too clear that the War for Southern Independence really WAS about slavery (to the state).

35 posted on 01/12/2003 5:18:28 AM PST by Gianni
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
Amen to your comments about the Libs. I would personally consider myself a pretty hard-core libertarian, but am still registered Republican because every time an (L) candidate gets in front of a microphone, they start their speech with something like, "My first act would be to sell the Grand Canyon and pay off the national debt."
36 posted on 01/12/2003 5:20:44 AM PST by Gianni
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson