Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: krb
You were implying (at least the way I read it) that it is not rape unless she was pulled off the street in broad daylight. "Not rape per se" in my book means, "We do not consider men who cannot understand 'no'" to be rapists.
49 posted on 01/03/2003 2:53:36 PM PST by Bella_Bru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: Bella_Bru
"Not rape per se" in my book means, "We do not consider men who cannot understand 'no'" to be rapists.

Ok, here's what happens when you read the whole sentence (emphasis added to try and make it easier for you to find the subject and verb and so forth:

The sub-topic of the thread started by Stallone/Movemout wasn't rape, per se,

So, you see, I wasn't saying anything about what level of crime occurred in the story posted, I was responding to another poster who doesn't read all of the messages she is responding to and then levels stupid accusations that reveal, well, that she doesn't read all of the thread that she jumps into the middle of.

It's all there. Read it. I am at a loss to explain how you could read that (if you really did) and think that I was saying that the woman wasn't raped.

51 posted on 01/03/2003 3:15:33 PM PST by krb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson