Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bob Z.
Geesh, I thought I'd seen some sanctimonious blowhards here on FR, but you take the cake. When I visualize what you wrote to me, I'm seeing a Saturday Night Live skit.

You think I'm incorrect, huh? We'll see what the court says. I have no doubt I've called this one correctly.

In answering my points, you've given us nothing but specious and disingenuous sophistry, sprinkled with holier-than-thou, God's-on-my-side righteousness. That may thoroughly convince you that you're right, but it doesn't go very far with the courts.

I stand by everything I said. This Bennett guy is a publicity hound riding O'Reilly's fame for his own profit, he violated copyright law, and his lawyers are incompetent or lying. And since you made sure we all know that you know him personally (twice in fact), you can tell him I said so.

163 posted on 01/03/2003 9:34:08 PM PST by tdadams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]


To: tdadams
This Bennett guy is a publicity hound riding O'Reilly's fame for his own profit, he violated copyright law, and his lawyers are incompetent or lying.

From one blowhard to another, for once I’m in agreement with you. But it does seem unfair that a talk show host, who Owns the microphone and doesn’t give enough time to respond to untruths, that person has no recourse under the law.

I’ts a shame.

167 posted on 01/03/2003 9:49:29 PM PST by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson