Replies

What I find odd is that in many State constitutions, there provisions about citizens owning and keeping guns is very direct and explicit. Why the heck couldn't the FF's just written something like, "No free man shall be deprived of the right to keep and bear arms during times of peace or war".

That's my point about the Ohio lawsuit. The Second Amendment Foundation started the lawsuit with three Ohio residents and the NRA is doing the negotiations.

If the GOA wants to prove they're a "No Compromise" gun group, why don't they sue the State of Kansas for the same thing. It would at least prove they do something other than put out e mail alerts?
If they have so much time on their hands they have to bitch about thirty year old failures, they can spend some of that time showing the other gun groups what they can do.