Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Torie
The "above" was refering to an excerpt from the article stating:

I was hoping there was some action taken by the administration on this, contrary to what's written in the article.

149 posted on 01/02/2003 9:29:22 PM PST by Jhoffa_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]


To: Jhoffa_
doesn't look good for the republicans does it? They want to run scared but Rush will be there to trip up their gutlessness.
154 posted on 01/02/2003 9:32:41 PM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]

To: Jhoffa_
I would hope the administration would take a view, or explain why it is in absolute equipoise on this matter, and thus will not for that reason. This is too important an issue to take a bye. That would not find favor in this direction. In the end though, I don't think SCOTUS will give a hoot what the administration thinks. This is one of those hard wiring issues. But my comment stands.
155 posted on 01/02/2003 9:32:52 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson