Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The GOP, Party of Cowards
Ever Vigilant ^ | 12/23/2003 | Lee R. Shelton IV

Posted on 01/02/2003 6:12:39 AM PST by sheltonmac

Most Americans seem to believe that Trent Lott deserved to suffer for his "insensitive" comments at Strom Thurmond's birthday celebration. Now that Lott has been forced to step down as Senate Majority Leader, neo-conservative Republicans are the ones cheering the loudest.

"We've wanted him gone for a long time," some have said. "We needed to get rid of him and move on with our agenda." The trouble is, no one in the party seems to know exactly what that agenda is.

Of course, that hasn't stopped neo-cons before. Pragmatism has always trumped principle, and as long as the polls reflect public approval for their actions, they really don't care about anything else. They must increase their majority in 2004 at any cost, and to do that they must first shake their xenophobic image.

As everyone knows, the GOP has long been branded as the party of racists. Such labels have been successfully utilized by the liberal left for years, and Republicans have tried everything to keep those labels from sticking. The end result is that in order to present the voting public with a kinder, gentler GOP, Republicans typically begin adopting Democratic positions.

It's the same three-step process every time: 1) liberals make the accusation of racism against a Republican, 2) the Republican denies the charge and 3) the Republican agrees to sign on to the liberal agenda, hoping that in doing so he might prove beyond the shadow of a doubt that he is not a racist. The entire fiasco surrounding Trent Lott is only the latest example of this kind of Republican cowardice.

Lott's comments sparked all the predictable reactions from all the usual suspects. Men like Al Sharpton and NAACP president Kweisi Mfume —both veteran champions of racial divisiveness —wasted no time in attacking the senator.

Sharpton, who had remained strangely silent in 2001 when Senate Democrat Robert Byrd let fly with his "white niggers" remark, said, "[Lott] should step aside. No one is saying that if the people of Mississippi want to elect him to the Senate that they don't have the right to do that. But to be the head of the party in the Senate, given the sensitivity of that position for the interest of the country and the party, Mr. Lott should step aside."

Mfume's response was a bit more harsh. He called Lott's little speech "hateful bigotry that has no place in the halls of the Congress," and dismissed Lott's subsequent apology as "too little, too late."

Reacting to the verbal barrage from the left, the neo-cons scattered. No one even bothered to mention the possibility that Lott was simply acknowledging the distinguished political career of his 100-year-old colleague. Nobody proposed that when the senator from Mississippi implied that we would be better off had Strom Thurmond been elected president in 1948, he was referring to some of the more noble causes Thurmond stood for, like states' rights and a less-intrusive federal government.

No, the neo-cons were so desperate to prove that they could be just as racially sensitive as their slightly more liberal counterparts that Lott's political fate had already been sealed. He was the perfect fall guy, and his sacrifice was worth it if it meant keeping the GOP in power.

Republicans, listen up. Whether you agree that Trent Lott should have resigned as Majority Leader or not, his ousting is yet another sign that you just don't get it. No matter what you say or do, you will always be viewed by the left as a bunch of bigots and racists. Bending to political peer pressure doesn't help —in fact, it makes you look weak. The sooner you learn that, the sooner we can begin repairing the damage your party has done to the conservative cause.

But it's probably too late. The mob has spoken, and Trent Lott has been forced out of his leadership role. Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah summed up what Republicans expect of Bill Frist, Lott's successor: "I think Bill has a kind of a more moderate record and a more moderate approach toward things, and I think that it's going to be very difficult to criticize him."

In other words, "if you can't beat 'em, join 'em." And that, my friends, has become the battle cry of the neo-conservatives in the GOP, Party of Cowards.


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420421-438 next last
To: Nick Danger
Sorry, it was post #58, not #51.
381 posted on 01/02/2003 3:59:41 PM PST by Concerned
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
Wow!

In fact that impressed Bill Frist, the man who just became ML so much that he praised good old storm up and down about it.
382 posted on 01/02/2003 4:01:00 PM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 376 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
In fact Frist was so impressed with Storm that on Nov 18 almost 2 weeks before Trent made some jokes at a birthday party about Storm,

Bill Frist was making

A Tribute to Strom Thurmond on the Senate Floor

A Tribute to Strom Thurmond: The Senate's Icon of Time
Senate Floor Statement


Monday, November 18, 2002
Floor/Committee Statement Of Senator Bill Frist, M.D.
print friendly version
back one page



Mr. President, born nearly a century ago, when Mark Twain was alive and Teddy Roosevelt was still President, Strom Thurmond has led a life of public service unmatched in the modern history of America. He has been a friend to all of the more than 400 Senators with whom he has served. And he will forever be a symbol of what one person can accomplish when they live life to the fullest.

Strom Thurmond has served in the Senate for all but four of my 50 years of age. Though that is a remarkable accomplishment itself, we should not forget what Strom accomplished before coming to the Senate.

He was a teacher, an athletic coach, and a Superintendent of Education. He studied law under his father, Judge J. William Thurmond and became a City Attorney, County Attorney, State Senator, and, eventually, a Circuit Court Judge.

Though exempt from serving in the military, Strom -- who had already been an army reservist and a commissioned 2nd Lieutenant by the age of 21 -- volunteered for active duty on the day we entered WWII. As a member of the 82nd Airborne, he parachuted behind enemy lines on D-Day and helped secure the foothold for the Allies to liberate the European continent.

For his distinguished service, Strom was awarded five Battle Stars and 18 other decorations, including the Legion of Merit with Oak Leaf Cluster, the Purple Heart, the Bronze Star for Valor, the Belgian Order of the Crown and the French Cross of War.

After the war, Strom returned home to South Carolina. He was elected Governor in 1946 and then ran for President of the United States as the States Rights Democratic candidate. Although Harry Truman prevailed, Strom won four states and 39 electoral votes. That tally still stands as the third largest independent electoral vote in US history.

Despite not winning the presidency, Strom was determined to serve in Washington. He ran for the Senate in 1954 and became the only candidate elected to Congress by a write-in vote in American history. Strom has been re-elected eight times since. Clearly the people of South Carolina value principle, character and courage in their leaders.

Though it has been more difficult in recent years for Strom to make it home to South Carolina, that has not stopped South Carolina from coming to him. And it shouldn't. For decades Strom attended every county fair, handled every constituent request, and sent a congratulatory note to every high school graduate, many of whom came to intern in his office.

It has been said that almost 70 percent of South Carolinians have met Strom Thurmond face-to-face.

Over the course of his long and distinguished career, Strom Thurmond has been a witness to history. As a young man, he knew people who had seen Andrew Jackson, and he campaigned for the votes of men who fought in the Civil War. He and Herbert Hoover won their first elective office in the same year -- 1928.

But Strom has more than seen history; he's written it. Not only is he the oldest and longest-serving Senator, he has served with about one-fifth of the nearly 2,000 people who have been members of the Senate since 1789. And he is nearly one half the age of the United States Constitution itself.

Like the great experiment that is American democracy, Strom Thurmond has certainly faced his trials -- both politically and personally. Yet, through it all, he has always held tight to his principles, always upheld his beliefs, and always defended American values at home and abroad.

Today we say thanks to this giant of a man not only for the history he has witnessed and written, but for the service his life will inspire for generations to come. God bless our friend, our colleague, and the Senate's Icon of Time, the senior Senator from South Carolina, Strom Thurmond.

Mr. President, I thank the chair and yield the floor.

http://frist.senate.gov/press-item.cfm?id=188730

NOW WHERE THE HELL WAS THE OUTRAGE THEN Luis?

383 posted on 01/02/2003 4:04:57 PM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 377 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
You are getting dangerously close to being Baker acted by one concerned FReeper or another.

Don't you understand diplomacy "T"? It's the language of politics.

This is the seat of power in the world today, and the people filling the roles of leaders, unlike Trent Lott, understand that their words carry a great deal of weight.


384 posted on 01/02/2003 4:05:40 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 382 | View Replies]

To: sheltonmac
Everybody went to bed thinking Truman had lost and that Dewey was the next president. I didn't know that was the election that Strom ran in. Did Strom cost Dewey the election? Any of you computer search wizards or old geezers know the facts of that election. Did Strom cost the Republicans that election? Lott would really be frosted if realized the implication that we all might have been better off if Strom had not run at all.

I am glad that Lott is no longer the majority leader. But as usual the Republicans did the wrong thing at the wrong time for the wrong reasons.

385 posted on 01/02/2003 4:06:54 PM PST by B. A. Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Do you see Frist making the statement that America would have been better off had Thurmond been elected?

Take your meds...

BTW...the outrage is at Lott's remarks.
386 posted on 01/02/2003 4:08:00 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 383 | View Replies]

To: B. A. Conservative
Wallace ran as a communist so the two skewed the outcome a bit.
387 posted on 01/02/2003 4:11:44 PM PST by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 385 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez

After the war, Strom returned home to South Carolina. He was elected Governor in 1946 and then ran for President of the United States as the States Rights Democratic candidate. Although Harry Truman prevailed, Strom won four states and 39 electoral votes. That tally still stands as the third largest independent electoral vote in US history.

Despite not winning the presidency, Strom was determined to serve in Washington. He ran for the Senate in 1954 and became the only candidate elected to Congress by a write-in vote in American history. Strom has been re-elected eight times since. Clearly the people of South Carolina value principle, character and courage in their leaders.

FROM A Tribute to Strom Thurmond BY Bill Frist
388 posted on 01/02/2003 4:11:55 PM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 377 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
BS THERE IS NO OUTRAGE EXCEPT FROM COWARDS AND RATS
389 posted on 01/02/2003 4:13:10 PM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 386 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
1948 was interesting, we hear much about that bad Thurmond and his platform, on and on and on. No one here ever speaks of the democrat Wallace that ran for president at the same time. I wonder why that is???
390 posted on 01/02/2003 4:15:50 PM PST by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 387 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
MAYBE I CAN REWRITE AS YOU AND THE OTHER COWARD REPUBLICANS DO AND SEE IF IT DOESN'T SAY WHAT I WANT IT TOO!

lol

SEE YA L

391 posted on 01/02/2003 4:18:12 PM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 386 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
Anything that's done is never enough

Everything was covered with celophane to protect it against anything because nothing really exist.

392 posted on 01/02/2003 4:19:33 PM PST by my right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
1948 was interesting, we hear much about that bad Thurmond and his platform, on and on and on. No one here ever speaks of the democrat Wallace that ran for president at the same time. I wonder why that is???


BECAUSE ITS ALL ABOUT STABBING LOTT THATS WHY!
393 posted on 01/02/2003 4:20:28 PM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 390 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Lott stabbed himself, four years ago. Move on.
394 posted on 01/02/2003 4:21:12 PM PST by Republic of Texas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 393 | View Replies]

To: sheltonmac
It's the same three-step process every time: 1) liberals make the accusation of racism against a Republican, 2) the Republican denies the charge and 3) the Republican agrees to sign on to the liberal agenda, hoping that in doing so he might prove beyond the shadow of a doubt that he is not a racist.

Could someone refresh my memory about the other times this process that's been used "every time" has been used?

395 posted on 01/02/2003 4:21:37 PM PST by Randjuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
I wonder if ole Luis even knew about communist Wallace. Never mentions him. Socialists do not like to demean each other with the truth.
396 posted on 01/02/2003 4:21:57 PM PST by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 389 | View Replies]

To: sheltonmac
Now that Lott has been forced to step down as Senate Majority Leader, neo-conservative Republicans are the ones cheering the loudest.

No, true conversatives are the ones cheering the loudest. Lott was a wimp.

397 posted on 01/02/2003 4:23:24 PM PST by ContraryMary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
Like the great experiment that is American democracy

SAYS FRIST

doesn't he know we are a republic?
398 posted on 01/02/2003 4:23:46 PM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 390 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
1948 was interesting, we hear much about that bad Thurmond and his platform, on and on and on. No one here ever speaks of the democrat Wallace that ran for president at the same time. I wonder why that is???

Maybe because Lott didn't say anything about the country being better off if Wallace was elected?

399 posted on 01/02/2003 4:24:35 PM PST by Randjuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 393 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Off subject...Frist and friends will be the leadin to socialized medicine, thanks to the pubs.
400 posted on 01/02/2003 4:26:48 PM PST by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 398 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420421-438 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson