Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mwl1
This ain't gonna be a replay of 1992. It's gonna be a replay of 1984. Reagan's recovery did not begin until November 1982, and his recession was much deeper. We have a tax cut in place, with more tax reductions to come in 2003.

It would be very sweet indeed to have an '84-style win (except this time I'd like to expand the majorities in the Senate and House), and its a worthy goal to work towards. I'm just saying let's not get overconfident about our chances nor underestimate the danger of someone like Edwards, especially when the media is on his side as it obviously is or likely will be. We were overconfident about Bush I and Clinton blindsided us. Everyone was salivating over the prospects of taking on Clinton and his excess baggage, thinking it would be a cakewalk to blow away a womanizing, no-substance empty suit "pretty boy", then being chagrined that the sheeple would vote to throw out a good and decent man with a genuine record of accomplishment.

People will vote their pocketbooks in '04, like they always do. I know it takes time, but all the rate cuts and tax reductions haven't turned things around yet. I understand the business cycle and how the economy tends to be cyclical, and that no President has or ever will "run the economy", but my fear is that most of the sheeple don't, and will punish whomever is in office at the time when they think things are bad. If the economy is still in the tank in '04, I can envision Edwards laying claim to Clinton's "legacy" of the (false) "boom years of the '90s", and the press mouthing the line "are you better off now under Bush than you were (and will be again with President Edwards) under "President Clinton"? I really hope things will turn around by '04 and events prove my fears groundless.

63 posted on 01/02/2003 7:02:06 AM PST by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: chimera
I completely share your concern about the economic landscape. If the recovery is not in place by early 2004, all bets for Bush's re-election are off. However, I do believe a full-fledged recovery will be in place. In fact, it was in place in 1992, it just came about one quarter too late.
64 posted on 01/02/2003 7:06:06 AM PST by mwl1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: chimera
I totally agree with you.....Edwards should be taken very seriously. He is dangerous to Bush and the GOP. The Lib/Dim press is just desparate to find someone, anyone, who can win and they will think they have found that in this homo who, frankly, has little baggage.
69 posted on 01/02/2003 7:17:27 AM PST by AlwaysLurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson