Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jorge
Lott's controversial comments which sparked this entire thing were by any normal interpretation expressing support for the Dixiecrat platform Thurman ran on.

And those who insist on dismissing his comments as harmless or "meaningless" can therefore be interpretted as Lott/Dixiecrat apologists in my opinion.

How could you possibly have known any of this. Like the rest of America you had no idead what the Dixiecrat Party was or what platform Thurmond ran on.

You were eventually told what to infer from these remarks and that's what you did.

But you were not content to infer that Lott was a segregationist after being told that's what he meant. You had to go a step further and impugn anybody that dared defend Lott as segregationists themselves.

There's a word for that Jorge, it's called racebaiting.

199 posted on 01/02/2003 6:56:03 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]


To: jwalsh07
How could you possibly have known any of this. Like the rest of America you had no idead what the Dixiecrat Party was or what platform Thurmond ran on.

You were eventually told what to infer from these remarks and that's what you did.

Right. None of us could understand;

"I wanna tell you, ladies and gentlemen, that there's not enough troops in the army to force the southern people to break down segregation and admit the nigger race into our theatres into our swimming pools into our homes and into our churches."---Strom Thurmond, presidential candidate, 1948

We had to be told what it really meant.

Are you trying to make me laugh on purpose or what?

203 posted on 01/02/2003 7:27:40 PM PST by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson