Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FITZ
Patient insurance sounds like a good idea.

The burden of risk would properly be placed on the patient assenting to surgery.

Our current system places all risk on doctors, as if they are unerring gods, which is absolutely ridiculous.

19 posted on 01/01/2003 8:36:07 AM PST by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: angkor
Yes ---then it could be like flight insurance --if you don't choose to get buy it, then you can't claim anything. If doctors didn't have to pay for malpractice insurance, it could drastically lower rates for those of us not so likely to try and sue them.
21 posted on 01/01/2003 8:42:02 AM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: angkor
The other thing I think that would do is make the patient a little more conscious of what kind of doctor they go to ---I might not buy any insurance because I know the doctor I use is good. Or I could buy a cheaper policy because I have some confidence in that doctor.
22 posted on 01/01/2003 8:44:07 AM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson