Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New York Times raises price to $1 at the newsstand
Bergen Record ^ | January 1, 2003 | RICHARD NEWMAN

Posted on 01/01/2003 5:09:00 AM PST by sarcasm

If you're picking her up at the train station or on a street corner, the "gray lady" just got pricier.

As of Monday, the newsstand price of The New York Times in the New York metropolitan area - which includes 31 counties in New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut - went to $1 from 75 cents, a 33 percent increase.

The Wall Street Journal went up to $1 almost two years ago, but The Times is the first major general-interest daily in the New York market to charge a dollar a copy, according to industry observers.

"Premium quality means a premium price," said Catherine Mathis, spokeswoman for The Times. The paper has added new sections and features and is worth a dollar, she said.

"They're doing it for one single reason: Advertising revenue is under plan," said industry analyst Edward J. Atorino of Blaylock & Partners.

Outside of greater New York, the price for The Times - the nation's third-largest newspaper - has been $1 since 1995.

Atorino estimates the 25 cent increase will add $5 million to $6 million to the company's annual revenue.

In New Jersey, The New York Times has a daily circulation of 142,419 Monday through Friday, according to the Audit Bureau of Circulations in Schaumburg, Ill. Its Sunday circulation is 210,574 in the Garden State.

The Times is not changing its home delivery or subscription rates or the price of its Sunday paper, which is $3 in the New York area and $4 elsewhere.

The Times' move comes as some major newspaper publishers have cut newsstand prices hoping to boost stagnant or declining circulation.

Knight Ridder Inc., publisher of the Philadelphia Inquirer, San Jose Mercury News, and Miami Herald, recently cut newsstand prices.

The New York Post and the New York Sun have slashed their newsstand prices to 25 cents a copy.

The median price nationwide is 50 cents at newsstands and $1.25 for Sunday editions, according to the Newspaper Association of America.

In September 1999, the price of The Times went from 60 cents to 75 cents.

Competitors were critical of the latest price hike.

"The Times is a first-class newspaper, but what should be more important right now is readership, not revenue," said Mike Levine, editor of the suburban Times Herald-Record in Middletown, N.Y., one of the Ottaway chain of regional papers owned by Wall Street Journal publisher Dow Jones & Co.

The Times Herald-Record sells for 50 cents at the newsstand and its readers often pick up The New York Times or one of the New York tabloids as "a second buy," Levine said.

Jonathan H. Markey, president of The Record, said the price increase is "absurd." "We expect to aggressively seek additional readers,'' he said.

The Record gets 50 cents at the newsstand during the week and $1.50 on Sunday.

"In an environment where there is no inflation, and newsprint prices are at historical lows, there is no justification whatsoever for the increase other than to drive profits to excessive levels," Markey said.

Levine, Markey, and a spokeswoman for the New York Post all said their papers are not planning newsstand price increases.

Mathis of The Times said Tuesday that it was too early to tell if the price hike has hurt newsstand sales.

"Anytime you raise prices you run that risk," she said.

"I don't think it's going to impact the circulation at all," said Atorino, who has a "hold" rating on New York Times Co. stock, which closed 3 cents higher on New Year's Eve, at $45.73, and about 7 percent higher for the year.

The Times' readership is "more upscale" than that of many of its competitors, so the extra quarter will probably not drive many customers away, says Atorino.

"It means now I can drop a dollar on the counter and I don't have to wait for the change."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: Connecticut; US: New Jersey; US: New York
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

1 posted on 01/01/2003 5:09:00 AM PST by sarcasm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
I recently moved from Manhattan to NJ. When I called the Times to cancel my subscription, the woman was surprised that I did not renew delivery at my new address. I told her that I could not take their agenda anymore.

Now I only buy it once/week (on Tuesday for the Science Times).

2 posted on 01/01/2003 5:14:55 AM PST by Pharmboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
"The "gray lady"? More like "Gay lady". How do you define propaganda medium by a metaphor of an old woman? Actually...the more I think about it, it does sort of fit! Like old wives tales!!!
3 posted on 01/01/2003 5:15:26 AM PST by gr8eman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
"It means now I can drop a dollar on the counter and I don't have to wait for the change."

Hey, Edward J., you didn't have to wait for your change before, you cheap ba$t@rd. You ever hear of leaving a tip?

4 posted on 01/01/2003 5:17:35 AM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
Hey, for a few bucks more you can get a whore that will give you a back rub and a blow job...not acid reflux!

Happy New Years, everyone! Even you "sophisticated liberals" who believe the NYT!

5 posted on 01/01/2003 5:18:48 AM PST by Redleg Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
...good for you!

"raising their price?"...Surely there must be some mistake. The same "dim-rats" & "lie-ing-libs" who elected "Ole Custy" & actually read the rag!
6 posted on 01/01/2003 5:19:49 AM PST by Lilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
I think it odd when in the beginning they call it a "general interest" newspaper.

While I am sure the newsroom is not wall-to-wall Maureen Dowds I am convinced it is the liberal Dems who show general interest in reading this daily.

NY Post and the internet is all I need to survive.

- Chris
7 posted on 01/01/2003 5:21:25 AM PST by chris_in_nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redleg Duke
eww little early for the profanity
8 posted on 01/01/2003 5:21:44 AM PST by Lilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
I live in New Hampshire, and about once a year I get a call offering me home delivery of "America's Premire Newspaper". I tell them I read the Washington Times online and the lady sputters...."But...but...but, I was referring to the New York Times!" I then tell her that I consider the editorials of Pravda to be more fair and balanced and she is wasting her time. Once in while I get a response about my lack of "sophistication".
9 posted on 01/01/2003 5:21:59 AM PST by Redleg Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Redleg Duke
$4 BJ's?!?!
10 posted on 01/01/2003 5:22:24 AM PST by College Repub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lilly
Not when you go to bed before midnight! :-)

And while it might have been a shade off color, I wouldn't call it profane!

11 posted on 01/01/2003 5:23:46 AM PST by Redleg Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: College Repub
LOL!
12 posted on 01/01/2003 5:24:33 AM PST by Redleg Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
$1 is expensive bird cage liner!
13 posted on 01/01/2003 5:25:08 AM PST by Las Vegas Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redleg Duke
Well, seeing how it's New Years Day, and I'm here on my favorite website amongst FRiends...I'll let it sliiiiiiiide this time...
:D
14 posted on 01/01/2003 5:26:02 AM PST by Lilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
""Premium quality means a premium price," said Catherine Mathis, spokeswoman for The Times."

Yes, I know Catherine. But why is the TIMES asking a premium price?

15 posted on 01/01/2003 5:26:15 AM PST by Paulie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paulie
hee hee
16 posted on 01/01/2003 5:27:58 AM PST by Lilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
Reason number 1,254,345,676,334,456,001 not to buy that birdcage liner.
17 posted on 01/01/2003 5:28:16 AM PST by always vigilant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: College Repub; Redleg Duke
"$4 BJ's?!?!"

Two observations:

1. It seems that deflation is really here.
2. Too bad BJs are like airline seat-miles and electricity, impossible or difficult to inventory while prices are down.
18 posted on 01/01/2003 5:33:29 AM PST by APBaer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Lilly
"You don't have to get snippy about it!"
19 posted on 01/01/2003 5:38:26 AM PST by Redleg Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Redleg Duke
I live in a college town in Vermont. If you want to pick up a newstand edition of the Sunday Times it's an incredible $2.50 or $3.00 (I forget which). But, doncha know, the "perfect people" must have their Sunday dose of pap, no matter what the price. By noon the thing is sold out.
20 posted on 01/01/2003 5:53:05 AM PST by ricpic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson