Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: eccentric
Why do 'pro-lifers' consider these babies to be deserving of death?

There's a distinction to be made when a woman is dealing with a pregancy that resulted from a crime, and one that resulted from her own poor reproductive choices. If abortions were limited to only true cases of rape and incest (where a perpetrator was identified, and sentenced appropriately), and saving the life of the mother, 99% of abortions in this country would disappear. That wouldn't be perfect, but it would be a damn sight better than the wholesale slaughter going on today.

Its not that those children are "deserving of death" as you put it, but a lot of people (myself included, an infant adoptee) would find it impossible to compound a rape victim's trauma with the forced continuation of a pregnancy. Politically, it is absolutely impossible to get to that level of restriction.

12 posted on 12/31/2002 3:51:05 PM PST by hunter112
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: hunter112
The saddest part for the incest victim is being forced into an abortion by her attacker who is desperate to coverup his crime. Rape victims are 'forced' by society to have abortion because it is 'just expected.' However, throughout history, rape victims (anyone remember Kizzy from "Roots"?) have given birth to their children from rape and loved them as a fellow victim. Even today, slaves in the Sudan love their children that resulted from rape.

I guess I would just like people to re-think these exceptions they keep coming up with. The logic they are using is not pro-life, it is pro-punishment: irresponsible woman deserves what she got.

15 posted on 12/31/2002 6:13:57 PM PST by eccentric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson