To: EternalVigilance
Wake up. Bush is not going to sacrifice precious political capital by means of a replay of the Anita Hill-Clarence Thomas saga. To do so would be politically insane.
Scalia will get the nod. He is tremendously uncontroversial and was unanimously confirmed in 1986. RATS cannot possibly repudiate their prior acquiesence.
193 posted on
12/31/2002 1:22:10 PM PST by
mwl1
To: mwl1
I never said I believed it would happen, or that I support it...in fact I said exactly the opposite. It was simply interesting speculation.
To: mwl1; Miss Marple; Howlin; Congressman Billybob
They have a reason: It's called Bush v. Gore. No, if there is a pick of the reliable conservative people on the court, it would be Thomas, particularly AFTER the Trent Lott fiasco.
Combine it with a SCOTUS appointment that is Hispanic - not Al Gonzales, but instead, Emilio Garza, from the 5th Circuit. Viet Dinh, one of the Division heads at DOJ, might be a surprise pick as well.
236 posted on
01/01/2003 12:17:44 PM PST by
hchutch
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson