Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance
Wake up. Bush is not going to sacrifice precious political capital by means of a replay of the Anita Hill-Clarence Thomas saga. To do so would be politically insane.

Scalia will get the nod. He is tremendously uncontroversial and was unanimously confirmed in 1986. RATS cannot possibly repudiate their prior acquiesence.
193 posted on 12/31/2002 1:22:10 PM PST by mwl1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies ]


To: mwl1
I never said I believed it would happen, or that I support it...in fact I said exactly the opposite. It was simply interesting speculation.
196 posted on 12/31/2002 1:24:02 PM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies ]

To: mwl1; Miss Marple; Howlin; Congressman Billybob
They have a reason: It's called Bush v. Gore. No, if there is a pick of the reliable conservative people on the court, it would be Thomas, particularly AFTER the Trent Lott fiasco.

Combine it with a SCOTUS appointment that is Hispanic - not Al Gonzales, but instead, Emilio Garza, from the 5th Circuit. Viet Dinh, one of the Division heads at DOJ, might be a surprise pick as well.
236 posted on 01/01/2003 12:17:44 PM PST by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson