Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dog Gone

The above quote is from the linked article which is utter bull sh't. The decision was 6 - 3.

155 posted on 12/31/2002 12:12:15 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]


To: deport
Farah never lets the truth get in the way of one his rants.
159 posted on 12/31/2002 12:19:48 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]

To: deport
Dog Gone has explained the vote. There was nothing sinister about it. I thought there was at first, but there isn't. He wasn't voting against the parental notification law; he agreed that the minor in question may possibly have fit an exception that the state law allowed as written.
167 posted on 12/31/2002 12:41:46 PM PST by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]

To: deport
BTW, I take it Texas still has the law, doesn't it? If so, how on Earth could those that claim he ruled against the law be right? That is good ammo for our side if accurate.

BTW, I got screwed up in my past messgae thinking you said the article WAS NOT BS. That is why I wrote to you like you were an anti-Bushie...lol.
168 posted on 12/31/2002 12:45:10 PM PST by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson