Hillary Clinton's Intellectual Bankruptcy

Capitalism Magazine ^ | December 31, 2002 | Michael Hurd

[The Raven]

He's right. Hillary does seem way too bitter. It's not necessary, either. She must have a bad husband.

[The Raven]

[DWSUWF]

"...What happens if someone like this ever gains real power?..."

At some point, the distant chatter of automatic weapons...

[Broker]

It is pure folly to presume that HRC has anything in common with righteous virtuous people. Evil people are devoid of shame or guilt. Bitterness is a mild word for the inner thoughts of this grifter. Mia.... Splash this link with the congenital criminal review.

[TruthShallSetYouFree]

Hillary's ideas were recorded in her college thesis. It has been hidden from public view for all of these thirty something years because it demonstrates the one true love of her life: Socialism.

[boomop1]

Bitter is constitant with psychopath liars.

[TruthShallSetYouFree]

She must have a bad husband.

LOL!

[goldstategop]

And she's power hungry. She feels cramped being a Senator from New York and already is eyeing new political horizons.

[octobersky]

She must have a bad husband.

LOL! What an understatement!

[PGalt]

Intellectually and morally bankrupt. 100 Senators of The United States of America should be the best and the brightest, and we have a Hillary Clinton. It just shows you the POWER of propaganda.

[KeyBored]

The article is correct about Hilliary!'s bitterness and her reluctance to promote her true ideas.

In a sane world, someone like Hilliary! would have gone no farther in life than teaching at some backwater college or junior partner in a no-name law firm.

But this is not a sane world - she is a US senator from a large state - and being seriously considered as a candidate for president.

Hilliary! represents the last gasp grasp for ultimate power of the so-called 60's generation - radicals, ex-hippies, socialists, communists, and other assorted mal-contents. They've of course moved on - they're now prominent in government, academia, and the media. But they're never lost that disdain they once had for all things "American". They still wish to tear down "the system" and replace it with some socialist utopian paradise.

Hilliary! - ruthless, humorless, true-believer that she is -represents to them their last best chance to achieve "nirvana".

[Movemout]

I guess she was so bitter that she had her revenge by screwing Web Hubbel. Nothing like cutting off your nose to spite your face. I am still amazed at the fact the NY would elect her Senator. It defies reason.

[oyez]

POWER of propaganda

This woman couldn't be trusted with a soda straw, but millons adore her. That kind of marketed stupididty is more fightning than Hillery.

[Sunshine Sister]

...........and the power of the idiot voters of NY. No offense intended to those NY freepers.....but she did get elected there.......

[Piquaboy]

I would give some serious bucks to never have to hear from or see these two any longer.

[duckman]

"Just imagine, for a moment, if a prominent conservative U.S. Senator had accused all liberals..."
This is something that will never change as long as there is media bias. Just get used to it. Can't do anything else.

[Types_with_Fist]

Get used to it all. She will be the next president, I'm sad to predict.

[cgbg]

that kind of marketed stupidity is more dangerous than Hillary.

There is an individual from work that fits the profile of the perfect Hillary supporter.

This female has had more boyfriends than she can count, with children from several of them. Several of the boyfriends are currently in jail. One of the boyfriends still on the street is not happy that she has custody of their child. He stalks her and beats her up regularly. She expalins that she dosen't want to report him to the police because he "really" is just a nice guy who grew up in a tough neighborhood and is misunderstood.

I am not making this up--this is a real person--and a die hard Demoocrat and Hillary supporter.

There is no way to reason with such a person. One can only stay as far away from her and her "boyfriends" as possible. Undoubtedly her children will be monsters soon to be let loose on an unsuspecting society.

There is nothing "noble" about this woman. She is stupid and dangerous. People like Hillary use her in their rush to power.

[Mia T]

Dim Bulb _{HILLARY "YOU KNOW" CLINTON}

_{Congenital Bottom Feeder} ^{KnowNothing Victim}

Q ERTY4 ^{double bagel}

 

W I D E B O D Y. _{low-center-of-gravity} 

 _{rodham-clinton} ^{reality-check}

Democrat Debacle of '02

HILLARY CLINTON LACKS COGNITIVE CAPACITY TO LEAD

Q ERTY8

BUMP!

clinton Complex-Question Fallacy Scheme Results in Grotesque Media Deformation But No clinton Legitimacy

"What the hell is this moribund loser doing in the political arena, anyway?"

EW YORK, November 15 -- Employing the "When did you stop beating your wife?" complex-question type of fallacy, the clinton "infrastructure" has ordered Barbara Walters, Chris Matthews, Larry King and the rest of the media myrmidons of the left to ask hillary clinton the requisite "Will you run for president in '04?" question no less than three (3) times per "interview."

A subset of the CLINTON-WAS-AN-UTTER-FAILURE Containment Team Scheme , the clinton "infrastructure" complex-question fallacy scheme is intended to confer legitimacy on an otherwise loony concept: Another clinton--uh--presidency.

The clinton "infrastructure" is operating on the theory that the implicit question ("Why in the world would the zipper-hoisted wife of an impeached utter failure ex-ERSATZprez be qualified to be president anyway?") will be rendered, if not moot, certainly disremembered.

Alas. The clinton "infrastructure" complex-question fallacy scheme does not appear to be working. According to last month's Marist Institute poll -- and this month's election -- nary a soul wants hillary (rodham) clinton back in the West Wing.

 

"What the hell is this moribund loser doing in the political arena, anyway?"

While 70% of the electorate get it, only one pundit, Bill Bennett, has been sharp enough to see through this clinton "infrastructure" complex-question fallacy scheme. When Sean Hannity (Hannity and Colmes, FoxNews) asked Bennett whether "she would run," Bennett first asked Hannity to clarify who the "she" was, and, when told, delivered the coup de grâce, "Run for what?"

 

 

ALSO SEE:

HILLARY CLINTON LACKS COGNITIVE CAPACITY TO LEAD

Hardball's Softball hillary clinton 'Interview'

Senator Dim Bulb ANNOTATED

[Tijeras_Slim]

100 Senators of The United States of America should be the best and the brightest

The Senate is an oligarchy of ego.