Skip to comments.
Hillary Clinton's Intellectual Bankruptcy
Capitalism Magazine ^
| December 31, 2002
| Michael Hurd
Posted on 12/31/2002 5:17:01 AM PST by The Raven
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 last
To: Mia T
I really like how thorough you are.I save many of your Links btw.
41
posted on
12/31/2002 8:39:41 AM PST
by
Pagey
To: TruthShallSetYouFree
Let's not forget her heinous' early early support for the Palestinian terrorists...........decades ago.
This is conveniently ignored by the media but they had no problem going back decades to hyperventilate over Dubya's DWI.......
Yes, we have Washington Times and FNC to promote the facts now and then, but we have a long long way to go to make sure everyone realizes the pure evil in these grifters.
To: Movemout
She was voted in by city folk, not us good rural people. We know Bull when we see it.
To: The Raven
Intellectually bankrupt? Did Hillary ever have any intellect to bankrupt in the first place? If she did, it must have been a microscoptic amount, around the size of a bacterium or virus.
Why would I think of bacteria (the bad kinds) and viruses when discussing Hillary? H'm. Interesting.
44
posted on
12/31/2002 12:30:21 PM PST
by
Luna
To: OldFriend
we have a long long way to go to make sure everyone realizes the pure evil in these grifters. I used to like The Grifters. I loved Under The Boardwalk. And, of course, Up On The Roof.
To: The Raven
He asked the question what would happen if Hillary ever did gain power when she feels so bitter, what exactly would she do with the power?
That's a good question, because if Hillary is hiding her true ideas, then anything is possible.
For all we know, HIllary could be a communist, bent on overthrowing our government as we know it.
Why else all the secrecy and hiding of ideas?
To: Types_with_Fist
Hillary would love to run for President as soon as possible.
However, Goerge W. Bush is smart whipper snapper, and I don't think he will be easily overcome by HIllary, she is too transparent.
Hillary could only make it as first lady.
She needs a Bill to make her light shine, since her own bulb is so dim.
By contrast, President George W. Bush has a very bright light. His dad was a good person and nice man. But bright light doesn't come to mind the way it does when I think about his son.
Hillary will be tempted to take on the son, it's true.
And it's going to be fun to see her get frusterated.
It's already fun to look at her, everything she does post 9/11 is born out of pure frustration.
It's really rather entertaining if you think about it, don't you think?
To: The Raven
...and even against her youthful inclinations as a limited government/Barry Goldwater/Ayn Rand fan.
OK, I had to go back and read this twice. Apparently she missed the parts about being a "second-hander." She would have made a great cardboard villian in any of Rand's novels with no embellishment needed. Truth is stranger than fiction.
To: KeyBored
Before the onset of the sixties, both major parties achieved whatever goals they set out for incrementally. Some important ones like ending segregation were great victories for our country. But these victories were achieved through the common agreement and work of both parties. That is how most change should be done: incrementally so that the country has time to weigh the consequences of what it is about to change.
With the end of the sixties came the takeover of the Democratic Party by the radical leftists who previously had played a marginal role in their strategy. Most of the very conservative Southern Dems joined the Republicans and the Dems were left with a party dominated by its radical constituency. McGovern wouldn't have had a chance for nomination without the upheaval of the sixties. But the Dems were so severely stomped in the 72 election that the radicals knew they had overplayed their hand.
They then embarked on a strategy, we'll call it the east coast-west coast strategy, of gradually implementing their leftist anti-American agenda. They have been very successful in many non-political areas like education and popular culture changing the minds of many gullible Americans little bit by little bit to accept their Marxist schemes. The election of a radical like Hillary Clinton would make their dream of a thoroughly socialist U.S.A. one step closer. Bill Clinton was not a true leftist. He was simply the shrewdist most opportunistic finger-in-the-wind sociopath to ever inhabit the White House. Power was his only goal. He adopted whatever ideology that would suit his purpose at the time. Committed leftists like Hillary and her backers have bigger things in store if she ever gets elected.
To: Movemout
Reasoning had nothing to do with her election in NY. The fact is that the state, and especially NYC, is full of unreconstructed RATS and they voted for the party and for a presumed celebrity. She is a socialist with commie leanings and has been for years. The welfare moms and the NYC-Albany libs put her in office. That's the only reason.
To: oyez
One radio show yesterday did part of their their show on "What do you admire about Hillary, IF you do?" People who admire Hillary would call in and say things like they admired her intellect, she is smart. Some said they admired how she stood up to pressure when she was under fire, example: when the bill records for her law firm were missing then later found in the White House. They admitted she may have done something illegal, but they admired how she stood up to people investigating her. Makes NO sense, I know. But people who admire Hillary lack sense!!!!! No one came up with a truly GOOD reason to admire the beast!
51
posted on
01/01/2003 5:56:25 AM PST
by
buffyt
To: TruthShallSetYouFree
HRC has the husband she deserves!
It is here choice in lovers that gave her daughter those big, blubbery lips!
To: Redleg Duke
One caller to the radio show yesterday said Hillary is gay. They didn't have anything to base it on. But it seems to be a recurring claim. I keep hearing that she doesn't get a divorce because she is trying to hide her homosexuality, at least until after she is president. I think she is a very scary person. I call her Hillary Mistress of Darkness.
53
posted on
01/01/2003 6:04:49 AM PST
by
buffyt
To: buffyt
From Orwell's
Ninteen-eightyfour:
But this particular girl gave him the impression of being more dangerous than most. Once when they passed in the corridor she gave him a quick sidelong glance which seemed to pierce right into him and for a moment had filled him with black terror.I've felt that way about Hillery from the first time I laid eyes on her.
54
posted on
01/01/2003 8:26:59 AM PST
by
oyez
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson