Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE REAL HILLARY CLINTON: Episode #12 - Hillary Lied to Zeifman, Rigged Nixon Impeachment Protocols
NewsMax and other sources | 12-30-02 | dfu; Limbacher

Posted on 12/30/2002 10:04:30 PM PST by doug from upland

#1 - FJB
#2 - Children in Hospital
#3 - She Throws Coffee in Marine's Face
#4 - Dissing Health Care Execs Who Offered Solution
#5 - Hillary, the Commies, and the Black Panthers
#6 - Defiling the White House Christmas Tree
#7 - Hillary Calls the Police Murderers
#8 - How Did She Get Her Name?
#9 - Sister Frigidaire
#10 - Troopers and Secret Service as Servants
#11 - Beep, Beep, Get Out of My #$%&@&$ Way

NOTE: the survival of our Republic is threatened by two things -- fundamentalist Islamic terrorists and Hillary Rodham Clinton. President Bush is leading the fight against the terrorists. It is up to those of us who know the real Hillary Clinton to lead the fight against her. We must shine the light of truth on this dangerous woman so that all Americans may know the real Hillary.

#12 in the continuing series.

FROM NEWSMAX

The House Judiciary Committee’s former chief counsel, Jerome Zeifman, waited 22 years to unleash his bombshell, which would reveal that the deck was stacked against Nixon by none other than the wife of the man who now faces a similar fate. It was Hillary Clinton who rigged the proceedings against the 37th president, as Zeifman revealed in a little-noticed passage of his 1996 book, "Without Honor: The Impeachment of President Nixon and the Crimes of Camelot." Zeifman quoted his own 1974 diary, which reports that just four days after Nixon resigned "John Labovitz came to my office and apologized for having participated to some extent to conceal from me the work that was being done. Some months ago, he and Hillary lied intentionally to me and told me there were no drafts of proposed rules of procedure for the [Nixon] impeachment inquiry."

COMPLETE ARTICLE:

How Hillary Nuked Nixon

Carl Limbacher
October 1, 1998

"This is the most fun we've had since Watergate." -- Washington Post managing editor Ben Bradlee, during the Iran-Contra investigation.
OYSTER BAY, N.Y. -- On July 12, Charles McCarry's New York Times op-ed piece was titled, "Bill Clinton's John Dean?" It was a rumination on the similarities between Linda Tripp and the White House counsel who turned on Richard Nixon, thereby setting Watergate's wheels in motion.

As intriguing as the comparison was, the real eye-opener of McCarry's piece came toward the end, when he quoted Henry Ruth, Leon Jaworski's Watergate deputy prosecutor. McCarry recalled Ruth's memo, sent to Jaworski just 10 days after supposed "smoking gun" evidence forced Nixon into ignoble early retirement, which cited 10 areas of Watergate then under criminal investigation.

Ruth informed Jaworski: "None of these matters at the moment rises to the level of our ability to prove even a probable criminal violation by Mr. Nixon."

McCarry followed the Ruth quote with his own observation that the ultimate historical irony here was that Richard Nixon, whom historians have told us for 24 years had been caught dead to rights, may not have needed a pardon after all.

What about the June 23, 1972, "smoking gun" tape where Nixon ordered the CIA to block the FBI's Watergate investigation? Or where Nixon discussed the possibility of paying hush money to the Watergate burglars? Or the so-called enemies list kept by the Nixon White House on reporters hostile to the administration? Apparently, prosecutor Ruth couldn't find any evidence regarding these transgressions that he thought would stand up in court.

The tapes, however, sounded damning enough. And even Nixon, who at first thought those recordings would be exculpatory, realized after he reviewed them that his goose was cooked – politically, if not legally. In July 1974, as the House Judiciary Committee was reviewing the tapes and earmarking Nixon's supposed crimes, two young staffers were assigned by the committee's chief counsel, Jerome Zeifman, to research the protocols for impeachment. John Labovitz and another young lawyer, just 26 years old with the ink barely dry on her Yale law degree, began the arduous task of poring over constitutional archives. Labovitz's partner was Hillary Diane Rodham.

And research done by Labovitz and Rodham became the roadmap for three articles of impeachment reported out of the House Judiciary Committee that promptly destroyed any remaining congressional support for Nixon. Before the full House vote on the articles of impeachment, three senior Republican senators apprised Nixon of the handwriting on the wall. The Nixon presidency ended on Aug. 8, 1974.

The House Judiciary Committee’s former chief counsel, Jerome Zeifman, waited 22 years to unleash his bombshell, which would reveal that the deck was stacked against Nixon by none other than the wife of the man who now faces a similar fate. It was Hillary Clinton who rigged the proceedings against the 37th president, as Zeifman revealed in a little-noticed passage of his 1996 book, "Without Honor: The Impeachment of President Nixon and the Crimes of Camelot."

Zeifman quoted his own 1974 diary, which reports that just four days after Nixon resigned "John Labovitz came to my office and apologized for having participated to some extent to conceal from me the work that was being done. Some months ago, he and Hillary lied intentionally to me and told me there were no drafts of proposed rules of procedure for the [Nixon] impeachment inquiry."

The New York Daily News noticed this earthquake confession, and sought Zeifman's elaboration on the historic subterfuge perpetrated by our current first lady. The Daily News reported:

If the United States was going to topple its own president, rules were important, Zeifman told us Friday. "Suppose we were going to have the World Series next week and suddenly one of the team managers says, 'We want to change the rules to two strikes and you're out.'"

That's basically what [Hillary] Clinton and Labovitz did, Zeifman claims. In other words, they drew up new impeachment protocols to replace those in existence since Jefferson's day -- and then denied it. Congress -- and the country -- would have been completely polarized if it had seemed Nixon was being railroaded out of office with new rules, Zeifman said. (New York Daily News – Feb.12, 1996)

Nixon was likely guilty of the Watergate cover-up. But Ruth's memo to Jaworski shows there really wasn’t any "smoking gun" evidence of it.

And that's likely why Hillary Diane Rodham, who regarded Nixon as "evil," according to Clinton biographer David Maraniss, had to discard impeachment rules in place for two centuries in order to nail her quarry.

Now that America faces its second impeachment crisis in as many generations, it's worth remembering how the rules were bent by partisans committed to destroying a presidency -- when the target was Richard Nixon. And how the media looked the other way when it happened.

=======================================

I have had the opportunity to speak with Mr. Zeifman on two or three occasions. He told me that Hillary Rodham tried to convince the committee to deny legal counsel to Nixon for impeachment. Had the committee agreed to that, Zeifman was prepared to resign. On the George Putnam Show, he said on two occasions that both Clintons were likely felons. This was a life-long Democrat who broke ranks and recognized what the Clintons were doing to his party.

Zeifman also told me a story that I don't know think has seen print in any major paper. Of all the people who worked on the Nixon impeachment, there were only two whom were denied a referral by Zeifman -- Bernie Nussbaum and Hillary Rodham.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: evilincarnate; hillary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: ALOHA RONNIE
bump this post!
21 posted on 12/31/2002 5:49:45 PM PST by goldilucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland; Alamo-Girl
Wait. Watch. Worry.
22 posted on 12/31/2002 7:27:34 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks; ALOHA RONNIE
Thanks for the heads ups!
23 posted on 12/31/2002 10:49:29 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Joy Angela
Dick Morris does have her pegged, and it will be true again that her negatives go sky high when she opens her mouth.

Stage managing a senatorial run with the help of Moynihan's FBI file will be nothing compared to a brass knuckle presidential run and all that is out there on her. In my opinion, her most lasting legacy will be the history of the democratic party from Nixon's impeachment to her final ruin of the party with her run for the presidency in 08. Get your popcorn, this will be fun.

24 posted on 01/01/2003 11:23:41 AM PST by Thebaddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
On the George Putnam Show, Zeifman said on two occasions that both Clintons were likely felons.
This was a life-long Democrat who broke ranks and recognized what the Clintons were doing to his party.

Click on my profile page and scroll down on the right.

Then, ask yourselves if Richard Nixon was a felon.

25 posted on 01/01/2003 11:35:03 AM PST by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Zeifman declared that she was "not fit for any position of trust."

Apparently the 'rats think that that doesn't include POTUS.

26 posted on 01/01/2003 1:46:21 PM PST by Ed_in_NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ed_in_NJ
Thanks for adding that quote.
27 posted on 01/01/2003 1:59:12 PM PST by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3950b8757712.htm

See the above link where Zeifman writes:

"During my 14-year tenure with the House Judiciary Committee, I had supervisory authority over several hundred staff members. With the exception of Ms. Rodham, Doar and Nussbaum, I recommend all of them for future positions of public and private trust."

28 posted on 01/01/2003 2:13:06 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Thank you for the quote. I was unaware of Doar.
29 posted on 01/01/2003 2:24:05 PM PST by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
The whole letter written by Zeifman is--very interesting--no?

I would love to find a copy of his book. I wonder how an out-of-print book gets new life?
30 posted on 01/01/2003 2:26:23 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Doug, you're doing a service to your country that you can't begin to understand or appreciate the way WE appreciate it!

Keep logging the evidence and get involved with the heirarchy of your state Republican Party so you can help out when she DOES try for the White House. EVERY CHAPTER you're logging here will make excellent campaign commercials against that Queen Wannabe!

31 posted on 01/01/2003 2:31:55 PM PST by Wondervixen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
There is no bottom for the clintons. This couple are "Black Holes". They will even eat LIGHT itself, indeed they will eat each other. There is truth after all for calling the bent one as the 1st BLACK president.
32 posted on 01/01/2003 2:34:42 PM PST by desertcry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wondervixen
Thanks. Because Zeifman is elderly, it may be a good idea for him to film a television commercial now to be used when Hillary runs.
33 posted on 01/01/2003 2:42:02 PM PST by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
FYI I found several copies of the book at Amazon and also Half.com. I wasn't sure of the rule about linking to sites, but if anybody wants a copy it is out there.

I intend to go order a copy of Zeifman's book myself.

I think you are doing a great job of documenting hrc's true character.
34 posted on 01/01/2003 3:05:38 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
He and I have e-mailed each other --- jzeifman@yahoo.com --- if you want to compliment him on the book. He is one of the Democrats who actually saw what the Clintons were doing to his party.
35 posted on 01/01/2003 3:19:14 PM PST by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Thebaddog; ALOHA RONNIE
Stage managing a senatorial run with the help of Moynihan's FBI file will be nothing compared to a brass knuckle presidential run and all that is out there on her. In my opinion, her most lasting legacy will be the history of the democratic party from Nixon's impeachment to her final ruin of the party with her run for the presidency in 08. Get your popcorn, this will be fun.

Revolutionaries don't give up easily, and Hillary Rodham is a Radical with Revolution on her mind!

If she can't win the Presidency, God protect us from what her Communist Friends have planned for America.

North Korea, for example, is it just a coincidence that just on the eve of President Bush's VICTORY against Saddam Hussein, Big Bad Korea decides to muscle to the forefront of War News?

My intuition tells me that North Korea is on ORDERS to destroy President Bush and humiliate him in the World Court and make way for Hillary...

Hillary does not fight alone. She has a whole NETWORK of Terrorist and Communist "friends" who pledge their Loyality to the Cause.

Popcorn? Not yet. Not yet.

36 posted on 01/01/2003 6:18:26 PM PST by Joy Angela
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Joy Angela
belated thx bump

clinton's defenders ignore Federalist No. 57, and Hillary Rodham's constitutional treatise on impeachable acts -- written in 1974 when she wanted to impeach a president; both mention "bad conduct" as grounds for impeachment.

"Impeachment," wrote Rodham, "did not have to be for criminal offenses -- but only for a 'course of conduct' that suggested an abuse of power or a disregard for the office of the President of the United States...A person's 'course of conduct' while not particularly criminal could be of such a nature that it destroys trust, discourages allegiance, and demands action by the Congress...The office of the President is such that it calls for a higher level of conduct than the average citizen in the United States."

Mia T, THE OTHER NIXON



(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)

missus clinton's REAL virtual office update
http://hillarytalks.blogspot.com
http://www.hillarytalks.us
http://www.hillarytalks.org


37 posted on 10/10/2003 11:30:31 AM PDT by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: All

Bringing this one back today.


38 posted on 06/01/2005 10:39:06 AM PDT by doug from upland (MOCKING DEMOCRATS 24/7 --- www.rightwingparodies.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joy Angela
"Will Hillary be drafted as the 2004 Presidential Nominee and BYPASS the Primaries? "

How would that work?

39 posted on 04/02/2008 8:50:18 AM PDT by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Joy Angela

Never mind. Wrong year. Seems some stories just never end. :0


40 posted on 04/02/2008 8:53:15 AM PDT by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson