Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Republic of Texas
Again you did not read what I wrote ... so one LAST time ...

Actually I agree with this. I don't think that the government should be in the UI business. I think that people should be able to buy their own UI policy from whatever company would offer it. A company could buy it for their employees as a perk. I think that most people who are drawing UI would not object to it being a loan to be paid back at some later date. I am sure that a lot of people that are laid off would have been happy to purchase a layoff insurance policy

318 posted on 12/31/2002 7:35:33 AM PST by clamper1797
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies ]


To: clamper1797
If you think the government should NOT be in charge of UI, why do you advocate the government extending it? Like SS, if we are going to get gov't out of that business, ANYTIME you do it will be painful for someone. If you wait for a time when no one is affected, it will never happen.

BTW, on this thread, you've claimed UI is a gov't program and that it isn't. Which is it? (kind of a trick question, granted)

320 posted on 12/31/2002 7:41:10 AM PST by Republic of Texas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson