Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: daisyscarlett; Alamo-Girl; Victoria Delsoul; Caleb1411; demosthenes the elder; Mudboy Slim; ...
Ping-a-ling
97 posted on 12/30/2002 7:16:49 PM PST by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]


To: MHGinTN
Thanks for the heads up!
98 posted on 12/30/2002 8:10:00 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

To: MHGinTN
"The pro-choice dogma is a tremendous windfall for unprincipled women. They gain the new privilege of deciding whether or not to accept maternal responsibility while retaining the old prerogative of compelling paternal responsibility, with both options codified into law and supported by the coercive power of the state."

All too true, but this is not the argument by which to win the Hearts and Minds of the Sheeple, IMHO. Pro-Lifers can not make this a battle of Men vs. "Unprincipled Women" if our goal is to save the lives of unborn children. Of course it ain't fair as the Law is presently, but making this issue a primary selling point of the Pro-Life argument is a LOSER strategy that will only push potentially sympathetic women over to the RATS who relish the thought of SLAUGHTERING as many Unborn as possible.

Let's fight hard and fer keeps, but let's fight smart...MUD

100 posted on 12/30/2002 8:37:52 PM PST by Mudboy Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

To: MHGinTN
interesting concept. thanks for the ping.
104 posted on 12/31/2002 6:45:52 AM PST by demosthenes the elder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson