I had neurosurgery last year. Not a perfect outcome, but I'm a complex case. I cannot imagine suing my talented surgeon for doing his best, just because the outcome isn't all I'd hoped for. I'm better off than I was--still have some pain, but I'm STABLE now anyway.
I imagine that if a lawyer got ahold of me, and if I happened to be stupider or less moral than I am, he or she could persuade me that I was damaged by the surgeon, and that I'm "entitled" to a hefty wad of cash.
To: ChemistCat
"entitled" to a hefty wad of cash.
Yes. It's all well and good to blame
greedy shysters and crazy juries; but considering 90% of malpractice claims are BS, the greedy self-serving patient (or patient's family) has a defining role to play.
Of couse, the arrogant doctor (and surgeons are the most arrogant of all, as a class) who enjoys and encourages being treated like god, is not exactly an innocent victim when his patients are then disappointed and angered by less than godlike results.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson