Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pabianice
Let's face it: fox hunting is pretty purely cruel and useless. The fox is run to death, terrified for hours, attacked by dogs, and then shot. After its death it is useless as food. Quite a different activity than stalking an animal on foot for a quick kill.

In the British Isles the fox is a serious agricultural pest, one that does tremendous damage to chicken and sheep farmers. Foxes will actually eat a lamb as it is being born. British farmers feel a deep rage against foxes, not only for the great economic harm they do but for the suffering and death of their carefully-bred livestock. Somehow, the fox population has to be kept under control, but as long as foxes have this abundant food supply, their numbers continue to grow.

Last year Lord Burns, who was delegated by the Crown to prepare a lengthy in-depth report on the problems of the fox population, considered various ways of fox population control. The verdict was that because of the nature of foxes, it was more cruel to trap, gas, or shoot them than to hunt them with hounds.

For people who don't live in and work in the country, chasing the foxes may seem cruel. Well, death is cruel, and it is a hard part of country life, one that suburbanites don't often understand. The hounds give the fox a quick death--the fox is killed instantly with a quick twist to its neck. (It is not shot, by the way.) The speed of the horses and hounds provides the most efficient way of catching this swift, elusive, and very intelligent animal in a land where ATVs are not useful.

In Britain the battle against foxhunting is led by Marxist-Leninist animal rights activists who are quite violent and are not above murderously attacking hunters and their innocent horses. (A reporter for England's Independent newspaper a few weeks ago secretly tape-recorded animal-rights activists planning to injure or kill Prince Henry at a foxhunt.) The anti-hunting movement is fueled by class envy--the mistaken idea that only the rich ride horses--and by the well-meaning but sentimental city person's ignorance of country life. It is part of the process that threatens to end traditional English life and values.

32 posted on 12/28/2002 9:09:35 AM PST by Capriole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: Capriole
Boy, have you been fooled by the romantic images portrayed of "the hunt" by the hunters.

I've been to a fox hunt several times. The fox is ALREADY IN A CAGE, and is released solely for the "sport" of catching and killing it. On one occassion, the hunters and dogs lost the fox within a few minutes, returning to release another. They are actually INCREASING the fox population by fox "hunting!"

By the way, they lost three foxes that day, and didn't catch one. Bad day? No way. We saw a rider leave his mount going over a hedgerow, landing on his @$$ in the mud from a good 6-8 feet. It looked worse than it was, as his pride suffered the most damage. But we sat in the pub and went through a fair number of pints laughing at him, and the escape of three condemned foxes.

I heartily recommend a trip to "follow the hounds" if anyone is ever in Britain. It's a load of fun, and make sure to bring your camera.

45 posted on 12/28/2002 9:49:55 AM PST by Henchster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: Capriole
They're going to be up to their arses in foxes the way we're up to our arses in deer. Screw the greens, they have no clue and are marxist dupes or fellow travelers anyway.
71 posted on 12/28/2002 4:31:42 PM PST by johnb838
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson