[doug from upland]

Whoops. The author of the piece is me, not Doug Thompson. I cited what Thompson had written. Sorry if anyone was confused.

[Michael.SF.]

Sorry to burst your bubble, but most Democrats will fall into two categories on this subject:

1. No matter what the proof is, they will not believe it.

2. Even if he is guilty (as I believe he is) he is still sympathetic to their cause(es) and thus they will remain in silent denial.

Consider this also:

By going after Bill, again and again, we make Hillary out to be the victim, thus gaining sympathy votes.

Bill is history and his star diminishes further each time he speaks. Hillary is the future star of the Dems and she will drop him, like a bad habit, the moment she no longer benefits from the relationship.

[ixeman]

this is an obviously intentional way to make unsuspecting readers think that novack and others had written this...when i clicked on thompson nothing came up...

clearly this is a veiled attempt at "intentional benchmarking" ...shame on you...this article needs to be deleated