Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RCW2001
Found a bit more on this "report"...

No more 'main enemy' in defense ministry text

by Kim Min-seok
December 28, 2002


The Ministry of National Defense yesterday published a report that substitutes for the controversial defense white paper that was withdrawn earlier this year. The report discusses Korean defense policies from 1998 to 2002.

The biannual white paper has discussed Korea's current defense posture; this year's paper was withheld because of North Korean complaints about earlier use of the term "main enemy" to refer to the North. This report omits the controversial term as it summarizes the defense policies of the Kim Dae-jung administration.

"We decided not to use the term because we value harmony between the North and South," an official at the ministry explained. But the report does not let the North off the hook entirely. "North Korea continues to enhance its military power, and there always exists the possibility of a provocation, for which the South should be fully prepared," one section of the report says.

The document boasts of progress the Korean armed forces have made in such areas as computerization of military information and the reorganization of the structure of Korea's forces. It also mentions the darker side of military life; it discusses an armed robbery committed by a military officer and notes that such cases have undermined public trust in the military.

The report also discusses the military capability of the United States Forces Korea and says in a crisis, a fleet of aircraft carriers and an additional 690,000 U.S. soldiers would be available for combat.

Source

9 posted on 12/27/2002 12:45:31 PM PST by RCW2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RCW2001
I think if the armed forces needed that many, lines would form at all recruitment offices [outside liberal la la land] Monday morning.

Military authorities would have to pick and choose, and as poster above says, many would be persons who served recently offering to go back onto active duty.

Liberals make a big noise, but are not really very numerous. I don't think it would TAKE 690,000-- more like a tenth or a sixth of that, but if it DID take the larger number, they would come right out of the wood work, no need at all for the draft.

15 posted on 12/27/2002 12:49:31 PM PST by crystalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson