Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: debg
new moon: 15:23 EST, Jan. 2nd

then it would still be New Years here in the US wouldn't it?
268 posted on 12/27/2002 11:56:42 AM PST by Domestic Church
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies ]


To: Domestic Church
new moon: 15:23 EST, Jan. 2nd

then it would still be New Years here in the US wouldn't it?

Er, nope. It would be 3:23 pm 1/2/2003 in New York, 2:23 pm 1/2/2003 in Chicago, so on and so forth.

272 posted on 12/27/2002 11:58:25 AM PST by steveegg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies ]

To: Domestic Church
it is too soon for us to attack on this new moon, look at it on the next new moon, all assets will be in place, time enough for the inspectors to scoot, and maybe gain a little time with N. Korea.

I think the timetable has remained where it is, I do NOT think that N. Korea is moving anything forward.

This would all have happened anyway.

I thnk Rummy is right, we can fight on 2 fronts, it will just be harder.
274 posted on 12/27/2002 11:59:19 AM PST by Aric2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies ]

To: Domestic Church
new moon: 15:23 EST, Jan. 2nd

then it would still be New Years here in the US wouldn't it?

EST = Eastern Standard Time

That won't be New Years.

278 posted on 12/27/2002 11:59:56 AM PST by relee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson