Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The USS George Washington is heading to Gulf within 96 Hours.
Fox News | 12/27/02

Posted on 12/27/2002 10:04:44 AM PST by Sparta

The USS George Washington has been put on the alert and told to prepare to deploy within 96 hours to the Persian Gulf. Developing....


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400401-420421-440441-449 next last
To: fogarty
First off, they don't have the bodies to do a 'crew change'.

Schedule for the ship while it was back in port for 4 weeks.

Out of area leave takers get first leave period and the local leave takers take the second leave period (not everytime, just what I think happened for this special circumstance).

Onload replacement equipment, fix troublesome systems, add newer crewmembers that normally would be airmailed to the ship but with the buildup taking up all cargo aircraft this frees up cargo space.

And most importantly, add more nukes and offload pregnant chicks.

421 posted on 12/27/2002 9:21:02 PM PST by TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: genefromjersey
IN GOD WE TRUST

God Bless America, and God Bless our Troops

422 posted on 12/27/2002 9:21:45 PM PST by apackof2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 352 | View Replies]

To: Quix
IN GOD WE TRUST
423 posted on 12/27/2002 9:23:48 PM PST by apackof2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 306 | View Replies]

To: Republic of Texas
The first new moon in Jan. would be my guess.

Uh-uh. The second new moon in January. January 27.

424 posted on 12/27/2002 9:26:39 PM PST by Allan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah; In veno, veritas
One submarine would be quite sufficient.

I haven't heard from Mike lately and he usually sends me an email at least every three or four months even when he's deployed.

Hmmmm.

425 posted on 12/27/2002 9:28:55 PM PST by TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
But the question is .. why would NK be so stupid to try a stunt like this??

Because they are commie scum?

426 posted on 12/27/2002 9:32:19 PM PST by TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Crusader21stCentury
It's PARENTS

who taught the politicians

their values . . .

directly

--though some might say by default.
427 posted on 12/27/2002 9:53:46 PM PST by Quix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 411 | View Replies]

To: Chemist_Geek
I couldn't figure it out before writing that msg.

Pondered it for years.

I don't know that it's totally reduced to jealousy but that's got to be a bigger factor than I'd ever thought before.

So hyper about their language etc.

The Chinese are a lot like that--but more subtle. Not prone to showing it overtly. Would be uncool and disclosing an embarrassing thing to the enemy.
428 posted on 12/27/2002 9:56:37 PM PST by Quix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 413 | View Replies]

To: Chemist_Geek
And OUR will,

and the wills of our leaders

to do the RIGHT and the SELF-PROTECTIVE THING.
429 posted on 12/27/2002 9:57:34 PM PST by Quix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 414 | View Replies]

To: fogarty
I don't think the draft could BEGIN before the essential exchanges were all over but the mopping up.
430 posted on 12/27/2002 9:59:51 PM PST by Quix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 417 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Whereupon you can hit Yongbyon immediately with a full-bore air strike with minimal casualties...

Of course the same sub that could sink the BB could also sink the carrier that the aircraft flew from. Unless you mean an Air Force strike from South Korean or Japanese bases.

431 posted on 12/27/2002 10:01:16 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: apackof2
HE ALONE IS OUR HIGH TOWER.

HE ALONE IS OUR EFFECTIVE DEFENSE.

HE ALONE IS TRUSTWORTHY.

HE ALONE IS POWERFUL ENOUGH.

HE ALONE KNOWS ENOUGH.

HE ALONE LOVES ENOUGH.

HE ALONE IS FAITHFUL ENOUGH.

HE ALONE IS GOD.

HALLELUJAH!
432 posted on 12/27/2002 10:03:46 PM PST by Quix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 423 | View Replies]

To: big ern
Because they've been told to or allowed to.

They are scrappy enough to do it like breathing.

Evil is like that.
433 posted on 12/27/2002 10:04:57 PM PST by Quix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 426 | View Replies]

To: CougarGA7
They have been defending a border with South Korea as if they were still at war since the Korean War ended.

Technically they are, since the Korean War ended with an armastice not a peace treaty or other document doing anything more than suspending the fighting.

434 posted on 12/27/2002 10:06:28 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: SLB
Gasoline here in Cnetral Kentucky went up $0.20 per gallon since last night

That may be more a reflection on the situtation in Venezuela than anything. They are a larger source for us than the middle east, and they haven't shipped anything in quite awhile. I believe I also read that the unrest has led to the insurance carriers pulling the insurance for ships loading there. It's so bad they are having to import gasoline from nearby countries.

435 posted on 12/27/2002 10:51:07 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies]

To: steveegg
For at least the next couple of moon cycles, the new-moon period coincides with daylight in the Northern Hemisphere.

The New moon always is up in the daytime. The new moon occurs when the moon is on the same side of the earth as the sun. That's why it's a "new" moon. Since the moon is much closer than the sun, that means that the illuninated/sunny side of the moon is the side away from the earth. The "dark side" (not the side that faces away from the earth all the time) is thus on the side nearest the earth, but since it's dark, and in the daytime sky, you can't see it. All this also means that the moon is not visibile in the night sky, anywhere on earth, and thus the nights are especially dark during the new moon. (No Moon, might be a better, more descriptive term)

436 posted on 12/27/2002 11:01:22 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 348 | View Replies]

To: bushpilot
the carrier is on 96 hour standby.....big difference being deployed to sea in 96 hours.

Not quite. The carrier has been on 96 hour standby since it came back into port. The action today starts the 96 hour clock running. At the end of that time, or more likely a little sooner, they are to be ready to deploy at any time, with no notice. That means the ship must be loaded and the crew, both ships and air wing other than the aircrews, either on board or very close, and the air wing's aircraft and aircrew, ready to fly out to join her. The previous status just meant they had to be able to get to get cocked and locked in 96 hours, now they are to be cocked and locked in 96 (now about 82) hours

437 posted on 12/27/2002 11:38:30 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 412 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
It is VERY hard to get closets cleaned and laundry done with all this stuff going on!

I agree, but we better hurry, there'll be more going on with that & N. Korea, I fear!

438 posted on 12/27/2002 11:45:38 PM PST by blondee123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
WWII we fought against Japan, Germany, Itlay and in the beginning the Russians

No western country fought agains the Russians, other than the Axis powers, with the exception of little Finnland, and that was before WW-II actually started. Yes the Russians had a non-aggression pact with the Germans, but that didn't mean they were allied with them. Even the poles really didn't fight the Russians, even though the Russians occuppied the eastern half of Poland after the Germans atteched the Poles to start WW-II.

439 posted on 12/27/2002 11:47:03 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 404 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
The "Bring Back The Battleships" thread is pretty much an ongoing one on the sci.military.naval newsgroup. The consensus there among some people who are VERY knowledgeable on things naval, is that de-mothballing the
battleships in the eighties was a bad idea then, and would be a worse idea now. They were a nightmare to keep operational, were a safety hazard to their crews, and didn't perform any function that couldn't already be done by other naval assets.

Their words, not mine.
440 posted on 12/27/2002 11:48:15 PM PST by kms61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400401-420421-440441-449 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson