Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wardaddy
what is objectionable to a monument to an American president in an American city?
152 posted on 12/27/2002 11:26:23 AM PST by ContentiousObjector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]


To: ContentiousObjector
what is objectionable to a monument to an American president in an American city?

That's my question too. It seems the only ones keeping this alive are the leftists who profit from balkanizing society and the ones who are [evidently] still upset about the outcome of the war. And as near as I can tell both groups are still living in a time 135 years ago.

163 posted on 12/27/2002 11:34:51 AM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]

To: ContentiousObjector
"What is objectionable to a monument to an American president in an American city? "

"If you don't know, I'm not going to tell you."
212 posted on 12/27/2002 12:47:52 PM PST by talleyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]

To: ContentiousObjector
Nothing.

But that is not the point. I admittedly assume they have chosen to place Abe and Todd in Richmond to make a political statement and if so then they should be aware of political grumblings or fallout.

Placing a statue of Ronald Reagan in Harvard Square or Sheridan Square would probably evoke similar grumblings but from different quarters.

Do you know for example if there is a statue of Edward Longshanks in Edinburgh as a comparison?
222 posted on 12/27/2002 1:08:52 PM PST by wardaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson