Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TRANSORBITAL ANNOUNCES SUCCESSFUL MOON TEST LAUNCH;READY FOR ROUTINE MOON TRAVEL IN OCTOBER 2003
TransOrbital ^ | 12/20/02 | Dennis Laurie

Posted on 12/26/2002 4:49:04 PM PST by Brett66

Transorbital Announces Successful Moon Test Launch

Now Ready for Routine Moon Travel in October 2003

SAN DIEGO -TransOrbital, Inc and International Space company (ICS)Kosmotras today announced a "perfect launch" of TransOrbital's "Trailblazer" satellite at 8pm Russian time. The launch represents a major milestone in TransOrbitals much -anticipated routine lunar delivery service.

Today's launch from the Baikonur Cosmodrome, Kazakhstan of the "Trailblazer" into low Earth orbit was pronounced a total success by TransOrbital president Dennis Laurie. The mission was designed to test rocket separation, downlink telemetry, spacecraft orientation and mass properties in preparation for the formal lunar launch.

Vladimir A Andreev, Director General of ICS Kosmotras said "We are excited about teaming with TransOrbital's first commercial development of the Moon. ICS Kosmotras Dnepr LV SS-18 ICBM provides a proven cost effective technology for lunar launches.

TransOrbital is on target to begin routine Moon travel starting in October 2003. Laurie stated "Significant commercial demand exists for high definition (HD) video, lunar mapping, data storage, scientific research, communications, and data archiving. Many corporate marketers see their products associated with the first commercial missions to the Moon".

"Additionally, there is worldwide demand from private citizens to send personal items such as photographs, legal documents, business cards, burial ashes, and jewelry to the Moon"

TransOrbital is the first and onnly commercial company licensed by the U.S. Department of State, and the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration(NOAA) for private sector flights to the Moon.

Sir Arthur C. Clarke noted visionary and renowned writer praised todays mission and commented "all good wishes on TransOrbital's successful TrailBlazer launch"

Support for the Trailblazer program has been provided by a number of companies including Lunar Enterprise Corporation and Space Age Publishing

TransOrbital, Inc. is a privately owned supplier of aerospace design, analysis and launch services. Established in 1998, TransOrbital is the first company of its kind authorized by the U. S. government to photograph, explore and land on the lunar surface. The 2003 Trailblazer spacecraft's primary mission is to return HDTV video and other multimedia content from lunar orbit to market as commercial products, as well as the delivery of both personal and commercial cargo to the moon.

About International Space Company (ICS) Kosmotras (www.kosmotras.com/ru) ICS Kosmotras is a private supplier of launch vehicles. ICS Kosmotras provides launch vehicles for many companies and countries around the world.

ICS Kosmotras activities under the Dnepr program are covered by special decrees by both the Russian and Ukrainian governments. The Dnepr LV is the worlds most powerful SS-18 ICBM. Unique for a light class launch vehicle, the Dnepr is able to deliver 3,500 - 4000 kg of payload into low earth orbit.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Technical
KEYWORDS: lunar; moon; private; rocket; space; transorbital
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last
Let's hope they don't alter the moon's orbit and send it crashing into Earth. </stupid enviro-freak>
1 posted on 12/26/2002 4:49:04 PM PST by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Brett66
This article doesn't look real. It's like reading the Book of Mormon - There's just something not quite right here.

Of course, it could just be me...
2 posted on 12/26/2002 5:04:35 PM PST by RobRoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
They just better stay the hell off my property!
3 posted on 12/26/2002 5:11:12 PM PST by jenny65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
Established in 1998, TransOrbital is the first company of its kind authorized by the U. S. government to photograph, explore and land on the lunar surface.

And the authority for this in the Constitution where?

4 posted on 12/26/2002 5:15:35 PM PST by DAnconia55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
authorized by the U. S. government to photograph, explore and land

Implies that the US either owns the moon, or the company is launching from or based in the US. Did they launch from the US? Are they based in the US? Either that or the US owns the moon.

5 posted on 12/26/2002 5:19:33 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
"Additionally, there is worldwide demand from private citizens to send personal items such as photographs, legal documents, business cards, burial ashes, and jewelry to the Moon"

Oh great: lunar chatchkis!

6 posted on 12/26/2002 5:21:10 PM PST by Petronski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy
it could just be me

It's for real. They aren't allowed to do any mining on the moon at this point, but they are licensed for the other activities.

7 posted on 12/26/2002 5:21:37 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Pretty incredible!

>>They aren't allowed to do any mining on the moon at this point<<

What? Is it our 51st state? Who "isn't allowing them?" What if they pick up some rocks, come back to earth and land in, say, Iran and sell the rocks over the internet from there?

I admit I'm being a little silly, but whos moon is it anyway?
8 posted on 12/26/2002 5:24:59 PM PST by RobRoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
I didn't see your post #5. We seem to be bringing up the same point.
9 posted on 12/26/2002 5:25:53 PM PST by RobRoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
A California company launching from Russia. I guess the state dept. should give it's approval. I'm of the Columbus school of thought; if you plant a flag there, it's yours. We've planted 6 of them.
10 posted on 12/26/2002 5:28:03 PM PST by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy
whos moon is it anyway?

The onerous 1967 UN Treaty on Outer Space precludes commercial development of that nature. You can take your own gear there and bring it back. You can collect data. You can build a lunar hotel for tourists out of your own materials. You might be able to collect moon rocks for analysis. But you can't use celestial materials to build things, not asteroid mining, not Martian water, nothing like that.

11 posted on 12/26/2002 5:29:07 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DAnconia55

Self-avowed Libertarians (who claim that possession of child pornography is perfectly Constitutional) should know that the moon belongs to whichever property owner it is passing over at any particular moment.

12 posted on 12/26/2002 5:29:32 PM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
I wish nothing but the best of luck to TransOrbital...
13 posted on 12/26/2002 5:31:00 PM PST by KevinDavis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Did we raitfy this stupid treaty?? I would just ignore everything from the UN.
14 posted on 12/26/2002 5:32:18 PM PST by KevinDavis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy
but whos moon is it anyway?

Noone has really achieved a satisfactory answer to that question yet. The Outer Space Treaty, of which we are a signator (sp?), seems to imply that governments can't claim property in space while individuals and private companies can. I believe this is the only current guidepost that we're going by. I think that once we develop real economic interests on the moon and other places that this treaty can be tossed aside as easily as the ABM treaty. Though this treaty isn't really a hinderance to business in space as it now stands.

15 posted on 12/26/2002 5:36:30 PM PST by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
You know, sometimes you read a post and all the replies and you wonder if somehow you are still on the same thread? The replies here read like a stream of conciousness novel. None of what's been said so far relates to the article. Is this a thread on the constitution, or property rights or moon exploration?
16 posted on 12/26/2002 5:39:02 PM PST by Arkie2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
Did we raitfy this stupid treaty??

The US is one of the three primary sponsors. The US ought to exercise the withdrawal clause, give the one-year notice, and dump it. Since no other country is even close to developing a space industry involving celestial bodies, the treaty limits only companies based within the US.

17 posted on 12/26/2002 5:39:05 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Arkie2
Is this a thread on the constitution, or property rights or moon exploration?

FR gets down to issues right away. The 1967 UN Treaty on Outer Space is the issue. Private property rights, ownership, is the obstacle; technology is moving right along.

18 posted on 12/26/2002 5:41:26 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy
"There's just something not quite right here."

RobRoy, I tend to agree with you. I got a weird feeling reading it too, yet I can't quite put my finger on what it is.
19 posted on 12/26/2002 5:41:58 PM PST by FreepLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jenny65
From the FAQ of the website you linked to (moonproperty.net):

LOL!

20 posted on 12/26/2002 5:43:31 PM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson