I'm up to my armpits in projects where mediocre engineers without ethic or ownership seek to churn out a deliverable without even making field verifications or to the contrary, hone a professional skill to evade cyclical review processes in hopes for milking a dry cow for modifications.
Good money won't turn a bad AE good.
Unfortunately for the profession, too many people with access to PCs, a spreadsheet, AutoCAD, and a handful of past drawings believe they have the acumen to design as professionals. Concurrently, every tradesman and his brother now believes they have the ability to design because they can afford a spreadsheet, copier, ACAD, and can knock out a plot plan or elevation or detail.
In the last 10 years, I've seen the profession slip considerably. Construction projects get knocked out today with about 10-20 cents on the dollar of actual value as compared to 20 years ago.
One advantage to this situation is that the lack of professionalism inherant in many designs today, insure job security for engineers in the future.
A disadvantage is that so much of the professions have become codified, that innovative unique productive design improvements are difficult to find today, simply because the bulk of financial obligations are directed to off-the-shelf, codified methods installed by tradesmen.