Posted on 12/26/2002 7:47:46 AM PST by theFIRMbss
I tried...but I could only get two down at a sitting.
Somehow downing a third gives me constipation.
Privately....I think the Cabbage Patch Kids are owned by Metemucil"
Of all the stupid
crap that gets funded these days,
why criticize this,
which actually
reports a repeatable
method for almost
eliminating
many cancers? It's a dream
come true. (But it's not
magic pills. It can't
be packaged and sold. It takes,
simply, self-control.)
This study might be
"evolution in action."
One group of people
will ignore it. They
will be -- statistically -- more
inclined to feel tired,
get sick, die young, not
compete with the folks who take
the study to heart.
Over time, the genes
that contribute to smartness
preferentially
will get passed on more
and simple numbers will make
our whole world smarter.
That is, I suppose,
if evolution does work
as it's supposed to...
An academic
who performs experiments
on himself rather
rather than pale-skinned
grad students or unaware
population groups?
This guy certainly
is out of touch with modern
academia...
...and the other 2/3rds wishing you were on the toilet...
You caught me. Left the land of fruits and nuts some six years ago, and still can't understand the obsession with cabbage here.
Brats, however, I understand fully...
That's the point. The first two give you the runs.
At least, they do if you are eating them correctly...
Since these long lived rats don't come in contact with normal mice who have the mice versions of diarrhea, skin infections, or colds, of course they live longer.
So if you want to starve yourself to live longer, don't go outside or let anyone visit you who might have a cold...
According to Sears,
all that you need to do is
cut 40%
off a "typical"
healthy 2,500
calorie diet.
Eat any balanced
load of 1,700
calories per day.
If you think in terms
of lean meat and fresh veggies,
that's a lotta food.
For people who think
(as I once did) in terms of
burgers, donuts and
Mountain Dew, it is
nothing. I'm trying to get
better. But it's hard...
It would seem that this effect has been reasonably established. Why, then, have not the details been researched more vigorously?
There is Political Correctness even in science, albeit driven by a motive different from traditional partisan politcs, that simply will not allow entree to a radical finding---no matter how impecable the research design.
For example, consider the Nature vs Nurture fiasco on gender and sexual reassignment: Nature won--nurture cost a few kids their sanity (and genitals)---despite the Nurture-Bound scientists' bent toward a leftist, liberal agenda.
It took years, and much hardship for patients who were sexually reassigned as infants and who all failed in their doctor-imposed-but false-gender, to conclusively demonstrate the point:
Don't mess with Mother Nature.
SO I don't know what to make of this study. I guess if I can live to be into my 90s eating what I'm eating, I'll be happy enough.
So I don't know what to make of this here study.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.