Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DWSUWF
In Village of Euclid, Ohio, v. Ambler Realty, the Supreme Court upheld zoning by only a 5-4 vote in the 1920's. In fact, there's reason to believe there was a 5-4 majority to rule against zoning until one of the justices switched. I wonder if these covenants would be enforceable if the Supreme Court had ruled against zoning.
56 posted on 12/26/2002 9:17:12 AM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: aristeides
".... I wonder if these covenants would be enforceable if the Supreme Court had ruled against zoning..."

Well, I think we've got some folks, right here on this thread, who would argue that a world without strict zoning, and all the legal baggage it brings, would be a world where cats would lay down with dogs, where day would be turned to night, where the fabric of time and space itself would unravel...

But I think that we'd simply have a world where it was a bit harder for people to mind any business save their own.

That's a very good, and sadly unanswerable, question.

60 posted on 12/26/2002 9:27:21 AM PST by DWSUWF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson