[Navy Patriot]

the lives of america's sons and daughters at war takes precedence over your free speech,,

In this case you are correct, Vinyl. Tuck is trying to blur a free speech issue into a "right to commit treason by sabotage". No such right exists, though Tuck (a DemoRat plant) wishes it did.

[SteveTuck]

Instead of protesting, Jenest said, people should sit down with their children and read the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence and "have a discussion about tyranny and explain that these anti-war protesters earn the freedom to disagree with our governments position thanks to brave men and women who have paid the ultimate sacrifice to preserve those freedoms."

[SteveTuck]

In this case you are correct, Vinyl. Tuck is trying to blur a free speech issue into a "right to commit treason by sabotage". No such right exists, though Tuck (a DemoRat plant) wishes it did.

Try looking up "sabotage" and "peaceful civil disobedience" in a dictionary (book with lots of words and their meanings).

[vinylsidingman]

In this case you are correct, Vinyl. Tuck is trying to blur a free speech issue into a "right to commit treason by sabotage".

these anti war folks can protest and dance in the streets til they all pass out as far as i care,, but disrupting "ANY" military operations while our courageous service people have their lives on the line is pure treason,,,

vsm